Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive value in the budget smartphone market. The Poco X4 Pro 5G and Redmi Note 12 are two strong contenders, each offering a compelling package. But which one reigns supreme? This in-depth comparison will break down their key features to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 Pro 5G takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging and superior battery endurance. While the Redmi Note 12 boasts a brighter display, the Poco's more powerful chipset and faster charging make it the more well-rounded option for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 23 | Available. Released 2023, January 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, MIUI 14 (International), MIUI 13 (India) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min | 33W wired, 50% in 22 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow | Frosted Green, Matte Black, Mystique Blue |
| Models | 2201116PG | 22111317I, 22111317G |
| Price | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 | € 151.99 / $ 219.99 / ₹ 11,999 |
| SAR | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 119h
|
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
-28.0 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 360745 (v9)
GeekBench: 1998 (v5.1), 2017 (v6) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Fast 67W charging
- More powerful chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Good value for money
- Display not as bright as Redmi Note 12
- Camera performance is average
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
- Brighter display (706 nits)
- Slightly more compact design
- Decent camera performance
- Slower charging (33W)
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower battery endurance
- No significant standout features
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, but the Redmi Note 12 has a measured peak brightness of 706 nits, making it noticeably brighter, especially outdoors. The Poco X4 Pro 5G's display, while not as bright, is still perfectly adequate for most indoor use cases. Both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates for fluid scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering decent photo and video capabilities for their price range. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G might offer slightly better low-light performance due to its more advanced chipset. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are not provided, but both are expected to deliver acceptable results for casual photography.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a clear performance advantage over the Redmi Note 12's Snapdragon 4 Gen 1. This translates to snappier app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The Poco's CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) is more powerful than the Redmi's (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55).
Battery Life
The Poco X4 Pro 5G shines in the battery department, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours, significantly higher than the Redmi Note 12's 101 hours. Coupled with its 67W fast charging, it can reach 70% in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, a considerable advantage over the Redmi's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is ideal for users prioritizing battery life, fast charging, and a bit more processing power for gaming or demanding apps. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 is a great choice for those who value a brighter display for outdoor use and a slightly more compact design, even if it means sacrificing some battery longevity and charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 12's display good for outdoor use?
Yes, the Redmi Note 12's brighter display (706 nits) makes it more suitable for viewing content outdoors in bright sunlight.