Xiaomi’s mid-range offerings are fiercely competitive, and the Poco X4 NFC and Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent two distinct approaches to delivering value. The Poco X4 prioritizes raw processing power with its Dimensity 920, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G focuses on a balanced experience with the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and responsiveness, the Poco X4 NFC emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming. Both offer comparable 67W charging, but the Poco’s CPU architecture provides a more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 43 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple, Milky Way Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 920
- Faster processing for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially better image processing capabilities
- Software experience may be less refined than Redmi Note series
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Balanced performance and 5G connectivity
- Potentially smoother software experience (Redmi UI)
- Fast 67W charging
- Less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 920
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature 6.67-inch AMOLED displays (based on typical Xiaomi Redmi Note and Poco series specifications), the specifics regarding peak brightness, color accuracy, and refresh rate are not provided. However, the panel technology is less critical than the underlying processing power in differentiating these two. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi typically equips its 'Pro' models with larger sensors. Assuming a similar approach, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G might feature a slightly larger main sensor, but the image processing capabilities of the Dimensity 920 in the Poco X4 NFC could compensate for any sensor size difference. The focus should be on real-world image samples to assess the quality of photos and videos from both devices. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) would be a key differentiator, but this information is unavailable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 NFC’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 920 represent a significant architectural advantage, offering superior single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 920’s CPU architecture provides a clear edge in demanding scenarios.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G claims 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes, while the Poco X4 NFC reaches 100% in 43 minutes. This difference is negligible in real-world usage. Battery capacity is not specified, but the more efficient Dimensity 920 in the Poco X4 NFC could potentially offset a slightly smaller battery size, resulting in comparable battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC if you need a phone that excels in gaming, multitasking, and general responsiveness. Its Dimensity 920 chipset provides a significant performance advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a more balanced experience with a focus on 5G connectivity and a potentially smoother software experience, though at the cost of some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for demanding games like Genshin Impact. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. The Dimensity 920 in the Poco X4 NFC will provide a much smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ Does the Poco X4 NFC overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 920 can generate more heat than the Snapdragon 695. While Xiaomi incorporates cooling solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings may lead to some thermal throttling. However, the performance uplift generally outweighs the potential for minor overheating.
❓ Is the 67W charging on both phones compatible with all USB-PD chargers?
Yes, both phones support USB Power Delivery (PD) 3.0, meaning they are compatible with most USB-PD chargers. However, to achieve the fastest charging speeds, it's recommended to use a charger that specifically supports 67W PD or Quick Charge 3.0.
