The Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC and OnePlus Nord 2T represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both leverage MediaTek Dimensity chipsets, but diverge in charging speeds and subtle architectural choices. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a tangible performance uplift, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is significantly faster than the Poco X4 NFC’s 67W. While both boast 100-hour endurance ratings, the Nord 2T’s overall refinement gives it the edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 43 min | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple, Milky Way Blue | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | - | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.6 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9)
GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC
- Potentially lower price point for budget-conscious buyers.
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3 for wider charger compatibility.
- Solid overall performance for everyday tasks.
- Slower 67W charging compared to the Nord 2T.
- Dimensity 920 chipset is less powerful than the Dimensity 1300.
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster Dimensity 1300 chipset for improved performance.
- Significantly faster 80W SuperVOOC charging.
- Higher peak display brightness for better outdoor visibility.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Poco X4 NFC.
- SuperVOOC charging is proprietary and may require a specific charger.
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a measured peak brightness of 636 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Poco X4 NFC, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio of the Nord 2T, the lack of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as power-efficient as on flagship models. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment, but the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The absence of specific details necessitates a focus on processing. OnePlus typically emphasizes natural image processing, while Xiaomi often leans towards more saturated colors. Without knowing sensor sizes or aperture values, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device is unknown, but would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro cameras, the main sensor performance will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco X4 NFC uses the Mediatek Dimensity 920, while the Nord 2T features the Dimensity 1300. The 1300’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 and 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 – represents a significant upgrade over the 920’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. Both are built on a 6nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 1300 provide a noticeable performance boost, particularly in sustained workloads. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5 is expected on both, though speed variations could exist.
Battery Life
Both the Poco X4 NFC and OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life under comparable usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging can replenish the battery significantly faster than the Poco X4 NFC’s 67W charging, achieving a full charge in less time. The Poco X4 NFC supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering broader compatibility, while the Nord 2T utilizes PD. The faster charging of the Nord 2T is a major convenience factor, offsetting any potential minor differences in battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC if you prioritize maximizing value and are comfortable with slightly slower charging. It’s ideal for users who primarily consume media and engage in casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you demand smoother performance for demanding apps and games, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 80W charging. It’s the better option for power users and those who frequently multitask.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 1300 in the OnePlus Nord 2T get noticeably warmer than the Dimensity 920 during extended gaming sessions?
While both chipsets are 6nm, the higher clock speeds and core count of the Dimensity 1300 *could* lead to slightly more heat generation under sustained load. However, OnePlus typically employs effective thermal management solutions, so throttling is unlikely to be a major issue. The Poco X4 NFC may maintain slightly cooler temperatures, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the Nord 2T compatible with standard USB-PD chargers, or does it require the proprietary OnePlus charger?
The Nord 2T utilizes OnePlus’s SuperVOOC charging protocol, which requires a compatible charger to achieve the full 80W charging speed. While it supports USB-PD for data transfer, it won’t charge at 80W with a standard USB-PD charger. You’ll need to use the included charger or purchase a compatible SuperVOOC charger separately.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the Poco X4 NFC and the OnePlus Nord 2T in terms of color accuracy and dynamic range?
OnePlus generally aims for more natural and realistic color reproduction, while Xiaomi often boosts saturation for a more vibrant look. Without detailed camera specs, it's difficult to quantify the difference, but expect the Nord 2T to produce images closer to real life, while the Poco X4 NFC might offer more visually striking, albeit less accurate, photos.
