The Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X4 NFC, leveraging the Mediatek Dimensity 920, aims for raw performance, while the Motorola Edge 30 Neo focuses on a more balanced approach with the Snapdragon 695 5G and a sleek design. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 920 chipset delivers noticeably better performance than the Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo. However, the Edge 30 Neo’s slightly brighter display and wireless charging offer compelling alternatives for specific users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.2 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 43 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Forest Green, Timeless Purple, Milky Way Blue | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | - | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC
- Faster processor for demanding tasks
- 67W fast wired charging
- Potentially better value for performance
- No wireless charging
- Display brightness data unavailable
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Wireless charging support
- More compact form factor
- Less powerful processor
- May exhibit throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, which will provide better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Poco X4 NFC (brightness data unavailable). Both displays feature an 'infinite' contrast ratio, a common marketing term that doesn't necessarily translate to superior real-world performance. The Edge 30 Neo’s smaller 5.9-inch screen size versus the Poco X4 NFC’s 6.67-inch panel may appeal to users preferring a more compact device. However, without refresh rate or panel type (AMOLED vs. IPS) data for the Poco X4 NFC, a definitive display quality assessment is limited.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The image processing style – whether the Poco X4 NFC favors vibrant colors or the Edge 30 Neo aims for natural tones – would be a key differentiator, but this requires hands-on testing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 NFC’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) – compared to the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). The Cortex-A78 cores in the Dimensity 920 are architecturally superior to the Kryo 660 Gold cores, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 920 is expected to handle graphically intensive tasks and multitasking more efficiently. The Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 is optimized for 5G connectivity and efficiency, but falls behind in raw processing power.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (data unavailable for Poco X4 NFC). The Poco X4 NFC’s 67W wired charging is competitive with the Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging, both promising a full charge in around 43 minutes. However, the Edge 30 Neo adds the convenience of 5W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Poco X4 NFC. This provides flexibility for users who prefer cable-free charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 NFC if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest possible wired charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a more refined design, a slightly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and the convenience of wireless charging, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for high-end gaming. While you can run Genshin Impact, expect to lower graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops during intense scenes. The Poco X4 NFC’s Dimensity 920 will provide a smoother gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How does the charging speed of 67W/68W translate to real-world usage on these phones?
Both phones can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 43 minutes, offering a very quick top-up. This is significantly faster than many competitors and ensures you spend less time tethered to a wall charger. The Edge 30 Neo’s 5W wireless charging is slower, taking several hours for a full charge, but provides added convenience.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs a concern, and should I rely on online sample photos?
Yes, the lack of sensor size and aperture information makes it difficult to assess camera performance accurately. Relying on online sample photos and reviews is crucial, but be mindful of varying lighting conditions and editing styles. Look for comparisons that focus on dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance.
