Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT edges out the Redmi Note 12 Pro thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset, resulting in smoother gaming and overall performance. While the Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a brighter display, the X4 GT's raw power makes it the better choice for performance-focused users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1190:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 747871 (v9) GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 8100)
- Exceptional Battery Life (112h Endurance)
- Fast 67W Charging
- Excellent Value
- Lower Display Brightness (600 nits)
- Potentially Less Refined Design
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter Display (890 nits)
- Potentially Better Image Processing
- Slightly More Refined Design
- Faster 50% Charge Time
- Less Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Shorter Battery Life (97h Endurance)
- Nominal 'Infinite' Contrast Ratio
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the display crown with a measured 890 nits of peak brightness, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Poco X4 GT's 600 nits is still respectable, the Redmi Note 12 Pro's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent image depth. Both offer good color accuracy, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro's brightness gives it a noticeable advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. Generally, the Redmi Note 12 Pro is expected to have slightly better image processing and potentially better low-light performance due to its software optimizations. However, the X4 GT's hardware is still quite capable and delivers good results in most conditions.
Performance
Here, the Poco X4 GT shines. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset is considerably more powerful than the Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance. The X4 GT handles demanding games with ease, while the Note 12 Pro might struggle with the highest settings.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT demonstrates exceptional battery endurance with an impressive 112h endurance rating. The Redmi Note 12 Pro's 97h rating is still very good, but the X4 GT clearly has the edge in longevity. Both phones feature 67W fast charging, allowing for quick top-ups, with the Redmi Note 12 Pro charging to 50% slightly faster.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a great option for those who value a brighter display, a more refined design, and a slightly more balanced overall experience.