The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value for money. Today, we're pitting two popular contenders against each other: the Poco X4 GT and the Poco X3 Pro. Both offer compelling features, but which one reigns supreme in 2024? Let's dive in!
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Dimensity 8100 chipset and 67W charging. While the X3 Pro boasts a slightly better display contrast ratio, the X4 GT's performance advantage makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 112h
|
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Faster Performance (Dimensity 8100)
- 67W Fast Charging
- Good Peak Brightness
- Modern Chipset
- Camera details unclear
- Potentially slightly less refined display contrast (nominal)
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Slightly Higher Nominal Contrast Ratio
- Solid All-Around Performance
- Good Value for Money
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Older Chipset (Snapdragon 860)
- Lower Peak Brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature LCD displays, but the X3 Pro claims a slightly higher nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1 compared to the X4 GT's 1190:1. However, the X4 GT's measured peak brightness of 600 nits is a notable advantage, offering better visibility in sunlight. Both displays are likely to offer similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Based on general knowledge, the X3 Pro likely has a 108MP main sensor, while the X4 GT may have a slightly different configuration. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, but the X4 GT's newer chipset might offer slightly better image processing.
Performance
This is where the X4 GT truly shines. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8100 chipset is significantly more powerful than the X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the X4 GT. The Dimensity 8100's 5nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
Despite both phones having the same endurance rating of 112h, the X4 GT's 67W charging is a game-changer. It can fully charge in just 46 minutes, compared to the X3 Pro's 59 minutes at 59%. This faster charging speed provides a significant convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
The Poco X4 GT is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Poco X3 Pro remains a solid option for those on a tighter budget who still want a capable all-around phone, especially if display contrast is a key factor.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco X4 GT worth the upgrade from the X3 Pro?
Yes, if performance and fast charging are priorities. The X4 GT's chipset and charging speed offer a significant improvement.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have the same endurance rating, suggesting similar battery life in real-world usage.