The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value for money. The Poco X4 GT and X3 GT are prime examples, offering flagship-like features at a mid-range price. But which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 GT edges out the X3 GT thanks to its slightly faster Dimensity 8100 chipset and marginally better charging speed. While both offer excellent value, the X4 GT's performance boost makes it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 112h
|
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9)
GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Faster Processor (Dimensity 8100)
- Brighter Display (600 nits)
- Slightly Faster Charging
- Modern Design
- Camera performance may not be significantly improved
- Potentially higher price
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Excellent Value for Money
- Vibrant Display (High Contrast)
- Reliable Performance
- Compact Design
- Slower Processor (Dimensity 1100)
- Lower Brightness
- Older Design
Display Comparison
The Poco X3 GT boasts a slightly higher contrast ratio (1425:1 vs 1190:1), but the X4 GT has a noticeably brighter display (600 nits vs 537 nits). Both offer vibrant colors and good viewing angles, making them suitable for media consumption. The X4 GT's brightness advantage is particularly beneficial in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance can be inconsistent. Detailed camera tests would be needed to definitively declare a winner, but the X4 GT's newer chipset may offer slightly improved image processing.
Performance
The Dimensity 8100 in the X4 GT is a significant upgrade over the Dimensity 1100 in the X3 GT. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the X4 GT. The X4 GT's 5nm process also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably similar between the two devices, with endurance ratings of 112h and 110h respectively. Both phones support 67W fast charging, allowing for a full charge in around 42-46 minutes. The X4 GT's slightly more efficient chipset might translate to marginally better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
The Poco X4 GT is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Poco X3 GT remains a solid choice for those seeking a reliable and affordable phone with a vibrant display, especially if found at a discounted price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco X4 GT worth the upgrade from the X3 GT?
If you prioritize performance and a brighter display, then yes. The Dimensity 8100 offers a noticeable improvement. However, if you're happy with the X3 GT's performance and are looking to save money, it's still a capable device.
❓ What are the camera specs of each phone?
Both typically feature a main sensor (48MP or 64MP), an ultrawide lens (8MP), and a macro lens (2MP). Specific sensor models may vary depending on the region.
