The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value, and the X4 GT and F5 Pro are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different users. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which Poco phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly brighter display, superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, and wireless charging. While the X4 GT offers excellent battery life and a strong Dimensity 8100, the F5 Pro's overall performance and premium features make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, White |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 112h
| Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Excellent battery life
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Fast 67W wired charging
- Competitive price
- Lower display brightness
- Less powerful chipset
- No wireless charging
- Camera performance lags behind F5 Pro
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Brighter and higher quality display
- Wireless charging
- Faster charging speeds (wired & wireless)
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are unknown
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a massive advantage with its measured 1059 nits peak brightness, significantly outshining the X4 GT's 600 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1190:1 for X4 GT and 'Infinite' nominal for F5 Pro), the F5 Pro's brightness makes it far more usable outdoors and in bright environments. The F5 Pro also likely uses a higher quality AMOLED panel, offering richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities (detailed specs are missing), the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the F5 Pro generally provides better image processing and computational photography features. Expect improved dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality from the F5 Pro. The X4 GT's camera is still capable, but not in the same league.
Performance
The Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerhouse, easily surpassing the Dimensity 8100 in the X4 GT. This translates to smoother performance in demanding games, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience. The F5 Pro's CPU architecture also contributes to better efficiency under load.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT holds a slight edge in battery endurance with an impressive 112h rating compared to the F5 Pro's 99h. However, the F5 Pro's 67W wired charging is faster, and the addition of 30W wireless charging provides added convenience.
Buying Guide
The Poco X4 GT is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a smooth experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The Poco F5 Pro is perfect for those who demand top-tier performance for demanding games, content creation, and appreciate a vibrant, high-brightness display and the convenience of wireless charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F5 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and wireless charging, then yes, the F5 Pro is worth the investment. The X4 GT remains a good value option if battery life is your top concern.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F5 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset. It will handle demanding games at higher settings with smoother frame rates.
