The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value, and the X4 GT and F5 are no exception. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but which one reigns supreme? This detailed comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its significantly brighter display, more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, and generally improved user experience. While the X4 GT offers a strong value proposition, the F5's upgrades make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 112h
|
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Competitive Price
- Decent Performance (Dimensity 8100)
- Lower Display Brightness
- Older Chipset
- Less Refined Camera
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Brighter Display (963 nits)
- Faster Performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Improved Camera (Likely)
- Slightly Higher Price
- Nominal 'Infinite' Contrast Ratio (less concrete)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage in display quality. Its measured 963 nits peak brightness blows away the X4 GT's 600 nits, making it much easier to see outdoors. The F5 also claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal), suggesting excellent black levels, while the X4 GT has a respectable 1190:1 ratio. Both have similar resolutions and refresh rates, but the F5's brightness is a game-changer.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities (specific details are missing), general knowledge suggests the Poco F5's newer chipset and potentially improved image processing algorithms will result in better image quality, especially in low light. The F5 likely has a more versatile camera system overall. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a clear winner here. It's significantly faster and more efficient than the X4 GT's Dimensity 8100. Expect smoother performance in demanding games and apps, and better overall responsiveness on the F5. The Dimensity 8100 is still capable, but the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 represents a substantial upgrade.
Battery Life
Both phones demonstrate excellent battery life, with endurance ratings of 112h and 118h respectively. Active use scores show the F5 lasting 11:52h, which is comparable to the X4 GT's expected performance. Charging speeds are identical at 67W, offering quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT? Users prioritizing raw charging speed and a slightly more affordable price point might find the X4 GT appealing. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Those seeking a brighter, smoother display, faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and a more modern overall experience will benefit from the Poco F5.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Poco F5 worth the extra money?
Yes, the Poco F5's improved display and performance make it a worthwhile upgrade if your budget allows. The difference in user experience is noticeable.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset. It will handle demanding games with higher frame rates and less throttling.
