Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Poco F4: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 edges out the X4 GT thanks to its significantly brighter display and slightly faster charging. However, the X4 GT's Dimensity 8100 offers strong performance and excellent battery life, making it a compelling choice for budget-conscious users prioritizing endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco X4 GT | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 23 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 27 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5080 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | 22041216G, 22041216UG | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 112h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1190:1 | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 747871 (v9) GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- Exceptional battery life
- Powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Fast 67W charging
- Competitive price
- Lower display brightness compared to F4
- Plastic build quality
- Camera slightly less refined than F4
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Slightly faster charging
- Premium feel (glass back)
- Good overall camera performance
- Slightly shorter battery life than X4 GT
- Can get warm under heavy load
- Price slightly higher than X4 GT
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 boasts a significant advantage in display brightness, measuring 1003 nits compared to the X4 GT's 600 nits. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1190:1 for X4 GT, 'Infinite' nominal for F4), the F4's higher brightness makes it much more usable outdoors. The F4 also generally has a slightly better color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, but the F4 often produces slightly more detailed and vibrant images, particularly in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is comparable. Video recording quality is also similar on both devices.
Performance
The Poco X4 GT's Mediatek Dimensity 8100 is a powerful chip, offering smooth performance for most tasks and demanding games. The Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 is also very capable, and generally offers slightly better sustained performance and efficiency. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 GT takes the lead in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 112h rating compared to the F4's 101h. While both offer 67W fast charging, the X4 GT charges slightly faster (46 minutes vs 38 minutes).
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is ideal for users who prioritize long battery life, strong gaming performance on a budget, and don't need the absolute brightest display. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is better suited for those who value a vibrant, high-brightness display, slightly faster charging, and a more premium feel.