Xiaomi Poco X4 GT vs Poco F3: The Ultimate Showdown

The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value, but choosing between models can be tricky. Today, we're pitting the Poco X4 GT against the Poco F3 to determine which phone offers the best overall experience. Both phones pack a punch, but cater to slightly different user priorities.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F3 edges out the X4 GT thanks to its superior Snapdragon 870 chipset and faster charging. While the X4 GT boasts a slightly newer chipset and impressive battery endurance, the F3's overall performance and charging speed make it the more compelling choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Xiaomi Poco X4 GT	Xiaomi Poco F3

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2022, June 23	2021, March 22
Status	Available. Released 2022, June 27	Available. Released 2021, March 27

Body
Build	-	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions	163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in)	163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	200 g (7.05 oz)	196 g (6.91 oz)
	-	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM)	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPU	Mali-G610 MC6	Adreno 650
OS	Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama	Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Triple	64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)	48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	-	HDR
Single	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	No
35mm jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	24-bit/192kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.3, A2DP, LE	5.1, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes (market/region dependent)	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
	-	Virtual proximity sensing

Battery
Charging	67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min	33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min
Type	Li-Po 5080 mAh	Li-Po 4520 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Blue, Silver	Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver
Models	22041216G, 22041216UG	M2012K11AG
Price	About 240 EUR	€ 162.15
SAR	1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body)	1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body)	0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 112h	Endurance rating 114h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	Contrast ratio: 1190:1	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-27.4 LUFS (Good)	-24.5 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	AnTuTu: 747871 (v9) GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)	AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT

Excellent battery life
Fast 67W charging
Vibrant display
Powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset

Slightly lower performance than F3
Nominal 'Infinite' contrast ratio on display

Xiaomi Poco F3

Flagship Snapdragon 870 chipset
Faster 33W charging
Potentially better display contrast
Smooth performance

Slightly shorter battery life than X4 GT
33W charging is slower

Display Comparison

Both phones feature excellent displays, but the Poco F3's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests potentially deeper blacks and better overall image quality compared to the X4 GT's 1190:1 ratio. The X4 GT's 600 nits brightness is respectable, but the F3 likely offers slightly better outdoor visibility. Both displays are likely AMOLED, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely comparable between the two, as both phones feature standard camera setups. Image quality will depend on software processing and specific shooting conditions. The F3 might have a slight edge in video recording due to the Snapdragon's superior ISP.

Performance

The Poco F3's Snapdragon 870 is a significant advantage. It's a proven flagship chipset that handles demanding games and multitasking with ease. The Dimensity 8100 in the X4 GT is also powerful, but generally sits a tier below the 870 in terms of raw performance. Expect smoother gameplay and faster app loading times on the F3.

Battery Life

The Poco X4 GT demonstrates slightly better battery endurance with an 112h rating compared to the F3's 114h. However, the X4 GT's 67W charging is faster than the F3's 33W, allowing for quicker top-ups.

Buying Guide

The Poco X4 GT is ideal for users prioritizing long battery life and a vibrant display on a budget. The Poco F3 is better suited for gamers and power users who demand top-tier performance and faster charging, even if it means sacrificing a bit of battery longevity.