The Android tablet market is heating up with compelling options at accessible price points. The Xiaomi Poco Pad and OnePlus Pad Go both aim to deliver a solid tablet experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Poco Pad leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while the OnePlus Pad Go opts for MediaTek’s Helio G99. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Poco Pad is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and higher peak brightness offer a smoother experience, especially for demanding tasks. However, the OnePlus Pad Go remains a viable option for casual users seeking a streamlined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | LTE |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA, LTE - cellular model only |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2023, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 23 | Available. Released 2023, October 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back | - |
| Dimensions | 280 x 181.9 x 7.5 mm (11.02 x 7.16 x 0.30 in) | 255.1 x 188 x 6.9 mm (10.04 x 7.40 x 0.27 in) |
| SIM | No | Yes - cellular model only |
| Weight | 571 g (1.26 lb) | 532 g (1.17 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) | 1720 x 2408 pixels (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.35 inches, 396.1 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | No |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, proximity (accessories only), gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 33W wired |
| Type | 10000 mAh | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Gray, Blue | Twin Mint |
| Models | 2405CPCFBG | - |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Longer battery life (9:15h active use)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software experience can be more cluttered (typical of Xiaomi)
OnePlus Pad Go
- Clean and streamlined software experience (OnePlus OxygenOS)
- Competitive price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Likely lower display brightness and contrast
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco Pad boasts a display capable of reaching 564 nits of peak brightness, significantly outshining the OnePlus Pad Go (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower based on chipset and price point). This translates to better visibility outdoors and a more vibrant viewing experience. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco Pad’s 1356:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more dynamic visuals. The absence of information regarding refresh rates on both devices suggests standard 60Hz panels, which is typical for this price bracket. Bezels are assumed to be comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within their respective budgets.
Camera Comparison
Given the focus on value, neither tablet is expected to excel in photography. Detailed camera specifications are unavailable, but it’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups suitable for casual snapshots and video calls. The absence of information suggests neither device prioritizes camera quality as a key selling point. Focusing on the core processing power and display quality is more relevant in this comparison.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco Pad’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is a more modern and efficient processor than the OnePlus Pad Go’s MediaTek Helio G99 (6nm). The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 features a prime core clocked at 2.40 GHz (Cortex-A78), paired with efficiency cores at 1.95 GHz (Cortex-A55). This contrasts with the Helio G99’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 provides superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use. While the Helio G99 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a noticeable performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco Pad achieves an impressive 9:15 hours of active use, demonstrating strong battery optimization alongside the efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The OnePlus Pad Go’s battery life is not specified, but given the less efficient Helio G99, it’s likely to be slightly lower. Both tablets support 33W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3+ on the Poco Pad, allowing for relatively quick charging times. The Poco Pad’s superior battery performance, combined with fast charging, provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco Pad if you need a tablet capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and content creation with a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s ideal for students, creative professionals, or anyone who frequently uses their tablet for productivity. Buy the OnePlus Pad Go if you prioritize simplicity, a clean software experience, and extended battery life for basic tasks like video streaming and web browsing. It’s a great choice for casual users and families.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Poco Pad handle demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Helio G99 in the OnePlus Pad Go will struggle more with demanding titles, requiring even lower settings or experiencing noticeable lag.
❓ Does the Poco Pad support stylus input or keyboard attachments?
While Xiaomi doesn't heavily market stylus or keyboard support for the Poco Pad, it's likely compatible with generic Bluetooth styluses and keyboards. However, the experience may not be as optimized as with tablets specifically designed for stylus input. The OnePlus Pad Go's compatibility is similarly uncertain.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Poco Pad and OnePlus Pad Go?
The Poco Pad runs Xiaomi’s MIUI for Pad, which is feature-rich but can be perceived as bloated with pre-installed apps and customizations. The OnePlus Pad Go utilizes OnePlus’ OxygenOS, known for its cleaner interface, faster updates, and more streamlined user experience. This is a key differentiator for users who prefer a less cluttered Android experience.
❓ Is the 33W charging on both tablets considered fast charging?
33W charging is considered moderately fast charging for tablets. It won't be as quick as the charging speeds found on flagship smartphones, but it should still allow you to recharge the tablets from 0-100% in around 2-3 hours. The Poco Pad's support for PD3.0 and QC3+ offers broader compatibility with chargers.
