The tablet market has a new wave of affordable options, and the Xiaomi Poco Pad and Nokia T10 are two contenders vying for your attention. While both aim to deliver a tablet experience without breaking the bank, they take drastically different approaches to achieving that goal. The Poco Pad prioritizes processing power with a modern Snapdragon chipset, while the Nokia T10 focuses on simplicity and a lower entry price. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco Pad is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly better performance, making it suitable for multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications. While the Nokia T10 offers a more affordable entry point, its Unisoc T606 struggles to keep pace, resulting in a less fluid user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | N/A | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| EDGE | N/A | - |
| GPRS | N/A | - |
| Speed | - | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 23 | 2022, July 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 23 | Available. Released 2022, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 280 x 181.9 x 7.5 mm (11.02 x 7.16 x 0.30 in) | 208 x 123.2 x 9 mm (8.19 x 4.85 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | No | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 571 g (1.26 lb) | 375 g (13.23 oz) |
| | - | Splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~249 ppi density) | 800 x 1280 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~189 ppi density) |
| Size | 12.1 inches, 424.5 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 8.0 inches, 185.6 cm2 (~72.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 360 nits (typ), 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 2 MP, 1/5.0", 1.65µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ | 10W wired |
| Type | 10000 mAh | Li-Po 5250 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Gray, Blue | Ocean Blue |
| Models | 2405CPCFBG | TA-1503, TA-1472, TA-1462, TA-1457 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.19 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco Pad
- Significantly faster processor for smooth multitasking and gaming.
- Brighter and higher contrast display for better viewing experience.
- 33W fast charging with PD3.0/QC3+ for quick top-ups.
- Likely more expensive than the Nokia T10.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
Nokia T10
- More affordable price point.
- Simple and straightforward Android experience.
- Decent battery life for basic tasks.
- Slow Unisoc T606 processor struggles with demanding apps.
- Slow 10W charging.
- Display likely lacks brightness and contrast.
Display Comparison
The Poco Pad boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 564 nits compared to the Nokia T10’s unspecified brightness (likely considerably lower given its market positioning). This makes the Poco Pad far more usable outdoors or in brightly lit environments. Furthermore, the Poco Pad’s 1356:1 contrast ratio suggests a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Poco Pad’s superior brightness and contrast give it a clear advantage for media consumption and general usability. The Nokia T10’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Neither tablet is positioned as a photography powerhouse, but the Poco Pad likely has a more capable camera system due to its overall higher-end specifications. While specific camera details are missing, the Poco Pad’s focus on overall performance suggests a more refined image processing pipeline. The Nokia T10’s camera is likely a basic setup geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. Without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison, but the Poco Pad’s superior processing power gives it an edge in image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two tablets is substantial. The Poco Pad’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (built on a 4nm process) is a modern, octa-core chipset featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 1.95 GHz. This architecture provides a significant performance boost over the Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The T606 utilizes a less efficient architecture with two Cortex-A75 cores at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores, also at 1.6 GHz. The 4nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 also translates to better thermal efficiency, meaning the Poco Pad is less likely to throttle under sustained load. This difference will be particularly noticeable in gaming and multitasking scenarios.
Battery Life
The Poco Pad achieves an impressive 9:15 hours of active use, demonstrating good battery life despite its powerful processor. The Nokia T10’s battery capacity is unspecified, but its less demanding chipset likely contributes to reasonable endurance. However, the Poco Pad’s 33W wired charging (with PD3.0 and QC3+ support) is a significant advantage over the Nokia T10’s slow 10W charging. This means the Poco Pad can be rapidly topped up, minimizing downtime. The faster charging is a crucial benefit for users who rely on their tablet throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco Pad if you need a tablet capable of handling demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, or running multiple apps simultaneously. It’s ideal for students, creatives, or anyone who wants a responsive and future-proofed tablet experience. Buy the Nokia T10 if you prioritize extreme affordability and only need a tablet for basic tasks like web browsing, email, and light media consumption. It’s a good option for casual users or as a dedicated media player for children.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco Pad handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Poco Pad is capable of running many popular games, including Genshin Impact and Call of Duty Mobile. However, you may need to adjust graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth frame rate. The Nokia T10’s Unisoc T606 would struggle significantly with these titles.
❓ Is the Nokia T10 a good choice for elderly users who primarily browse the web and check email?
Yes, the Nokia T10 is a suitable option for basic tasks like web browsing, email, and video calls. Its simplicity and affordability make it a good choice for users who don't require a lot of processing power or advanced features. However, the slower processor may result in occasional lag when loading complex websites.
❓ Does the Poco Pad support stylus input or a keyboard cover?
While Xiaomi doesn't explicitly market the Poco Pad with stylus support, it is likely compatible with generic capacitive styluses. Keyboard cover support is also available, enhancing productivity for tasks like note-taking and document editing. The Nokia T10 does not have official accessory support for these features.
