The Android tablet market is heating up, with the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and Oppo Pad 2 offering compelling features at competitive price points. This comparison dives deep into their core specifications, focusing on the crucial differences in chipset architecture and charging capabilities to determine which tablet best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slight performance edge, the Oppo Pad 2 is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, while the Dimensity 9000 offers a more powerful CPU core. However, the Poco Pad X1 remains a strong contender, especially for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 3G bands | N/A | N/A |
| 4G bands | N/A | N/A |
| EDGE | N/A | No |
| GPRS | N/A | No |
| Technology | No cellular connectivity | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, aluminum back | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 251.2 x 173.4 x 6.2 mm (9.89 x 6.83 x 0.24 in) | 258 x 189.4 x 6.5 mm (10.16 x 7.46 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | No | No |
| Weight | 500 g (1.10 lb) | 552 g (1.22 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support, 2.0ms latency |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~344 ppi density) | 2000 x 2800 pixels (~296 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.2 inches, 373.7 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.61 inches, 411.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 144Hz, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7675-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 732 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.3, 103˚ (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (data transfer only; not for payments - market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | No | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6 or 6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 1h 34 min | 67W wired, PD, QC 2.0 |
| Type | 8850 mAh | Li-Po 9510 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray, Gold |
| Models | 25099RP08G | OPD2201, X22N2 |
| Price | - | About 410 EUR |
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Efficient Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3+ for charging compatibility
- Slower charging speed (45W vs 67W)
- Less powerful CPU core compared to Oppo Pad 2
Oppo Pad 2
- Faster 67W charging with PD and QC 2.0
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Potentially better image processing
- Likely higher price point
- QC 2.0 is an older standard than QC3+
Display Comparison
Both tablets utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency. However, display specifications are missing from the provided data. Assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels (common in this price bracket), the user experience will largely depend on color calibration and brightness. Without nit ratings, it's difficult to declare a winner, but Oppo historically focuses on display quality, potentially giving them an edge.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent from the provided data. Given the tablet form factor, camera quality is typically less of a priority than on smartphones. However, assuming similar sensor sizes and lens apertures, the image processing capabilities of the respective chipsets will play a role. Oppo’s image processing algorithms are generally well-regarded, potentially leading to more pleasing results. Without further information, a definitive comparison is impossible.
Performance
The Oppo Pad 2’s MediaTek Dimensity 9000, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Poco Pad X1’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3. While both are 4nm chips, the Cortex-X2 is a higher-performing core than the Cortex-X4 in the Snapdragon. The Dimensity 9000’s three Cortex-A710 cores also outperform the Snapdragon’s four Cortex-A720 cores in sustained workloads. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Oppo Pad 2. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s three Cortex-A520 cores are comparable to the Dimensity 9000’s four Cortex-A510 cores for less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
The Oppo Pad 2’s 67W charging is a significant advantage over the Poco Pad X1’s 45W charging. The Oppo Pad 2 can reach 100% charge in just 1 hour and 34 minutes, while the Poco Pad X1 takes longer. While battery capacity isn’t specified, faster charging reduces downtime and improves usability, especially for users who rely on their tablets throughout the day. The inclusion of PD and QC 2.0 on the Oppo Pad 2 also offers broader compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 if you need a capable all-rounder with solid performance for everyday tasks and media consumption, and prioritize value for money. Buy the Oppo Pad 2 if you prefer a faster, more responsive experience, particularly for demanding applications and gaming, and value the convenience of significantly faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Poco Pad X1 struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is a capable chip, demanding games like Genshin Impact may require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The Dimensity 9000 in the Oppo Pad 2 offers a more substantial performance boost, allowing for higher settings and more consistent frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo Pad 2 in real-world use compared to the 45W on the Poco Pad X1?
The Oppo Pad 2’s 67W charging can add a significant amount of battery life in a short period. While a full 0-100% charge takes 1 hour and 34 minutes, a quick 15-minute charge can provide several hours of usage, making it ideal for users who need a fast power boost before heading out.
❓ Does the Dimensity 9000 in the Oppo Pad 2 generate more heat than the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 during prolonged gaming sessions?
Both chipsets are built on a 4nm process, which helps with thermal efficiency. However, the Dimensity 9000, being a more powerful chip, may generate slightly more heat under sustained load. Oppo likely incorporates effective cooling solutions to mitigate this, but some throttling may occur during extended gaming sessions.
