Poco M7 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: Which Xiaomi Phone Wins?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery and fast charging, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is the better choice. Its 67W charging and impressive 11:36h active use battery life significantly outweigh the Poco M7’s slightly more modern chipset. However, the Poco M7 offers a compelling value for those focused on efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 07 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.4 g (7.23 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.4", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 16 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green | Midnight Black, Lavender Purple, Forest Green |
| Models | 24108PCE2I, MZB0KE1IN | 23117RA68G, 2312FPCA6G |
| Price | € 135.00 / £ 118.00 / ₹ 8,999 | € 92.00 / $ 269.99 / £ 299.99 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.76 W/kg (body) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco M7
- More efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially longer software support due to newer processor
- Competitive price point
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Bright 1047 nit display
- Excellent 11:36h active use battery life
- Less efficient Helio G99 Ultra chipset
- Older 6nm process node
- Potentially less long-term software support
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1047 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Poco M7, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its chipset and price point. While both likely utilize LCD panels (based on market segment), the Redmi’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration make it superior for media consumption. The absence of high refresh rate information for both devices suggests a standard 60Hz experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature multi-camera setups, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is likely to have a more refined camera system, given Xiaomi’s history with the ‘Pro’ designation. While the Poco M7 will likely offer acceptable image quality for social media, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is expected to deliver better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of OIS information for both suggests a reliance on software stabilization. We anticipate the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G will have a more versatile camera experience.
Performance
The Poco M7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a more modern architecture than the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra (6nm). The 4nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life under sustained loads. However, the Helio G99 Ultra features slightly higher clocked Cortex-A76 cores (2.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Poco), which could translate to a marginal performance edge in some tasks. Both phones utilize an octa-core configuration with a similar mix of performance and efficiency cores, but the Snapdragon’s newer architecture is a long-term advantage. The Poco M7's efficiency will be more noticeable in sustained tasks.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G shines in the battery department with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 16 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Poco M7’s slower 18W charging. While the Poco M7’s more efficient chipset may contribute to longer standby times, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G’s active use score of 11:36h demonstrates excellent real-world battery life. The faster charging speed significantly reduces downtime, making the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G more convenient for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 if you need a phone with a focus on long-term efficiency and a newer processor architecture, even if it means sacrificing charging speed. It’s ideal for users who prioritize software longevity and don’t mind slower top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G if you prefer a brighter display, incredibly fast charging, and a proven track record of solid battery performance. This phone is best for users who are always on the go and need to quickly replenish their battery.