Poco X6 Pro vs. Poco M7: Which Xiaomi Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides significantly more processing power, a brighter display, and much faster 67W charging. While the M7 offers respectable efficiency, the X6 Pro’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 07 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.4 g (7.23 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | 24108PCE2I, MZB0KE1IN | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | € 135.00 / £ 118.00 / ₹ 8,999 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.76 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco M7
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Less powerful processor for gaming and multitasking
- Likely dimmer display
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Much faster 67W charging
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra processor
- Brighter and potentially smoother display
- Superior gaming performance
- Higher price tag
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the M7, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be considerably dimmer given its market positioning. While both likely utilize LCD panels, the X6 Pro’s higher brightness and potentially wider color gamut will deliver a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of refresh rate data for the M7 suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the X6 Pro is likely to offer a smoother 120Hz experience, enhancing scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
The context data for both devices is limited regarding camera specifics. However, given the X6 Pro’s positioning, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The M7 likely features a more basic camera setup focused on capturing acceptable photos in good lighting conditions. While both may include a secondary depth or macro sensor, these are typically of limited utility. The X6 Pro’s image processing capabilities, driven by the more powerful chipset, will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a powerhouse. Its octa-core configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – delivers substantially more processing power than the Poco M7’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (also 4nm). The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency, making it suitable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and applications. The X6 Pro’s superior CPU and GPU will translate to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in charging speed with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 45 minutes, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0 standards. The Poco M7 is limited to 18W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. While the M7 may have a larger battery capacity (data not provided), the X6 Pro’s active use score of 11:46h suggests excellent battery optimization and efficient power management, potentially offsetting any capacity difference. The faster charging of the X6 Pro is a significant convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 if you prioritize long-term battery life and a lower upfront cost, and your primary use case revolves around basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand smooth multitasking, enjoy mobile gaming, and value a vibrant display with rapid charging capabilities. The X6 Pro is for users who want a powerful, versatile device without breaking the bank.