Poco M7 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A Detailed Comparison for Budget-Conscious Buyers
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term software support and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice. However, the Poco M7 offers a compelling performance-per-dollar ratio, particularly for those focused on gaming and less concerned with Samsung’s ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 07 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 205.4 g (7.23 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | 24108PCE2I, MZB0KE1IN | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | € 135.00 / £ 118.00 / ₹ 8,999 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.76 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco M7
- Strong performance for the price
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially more affordable
- Likely inferior display quality
- Slower charging speed
- Less established brand reputation
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent display brightness and quality
- Longer battery life in active use
- Faster charging support
- Higher price point
- Exynos chipset may throttle under sustained load
- Software bloatware (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significant advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This translates to excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a scenario where the Poco M7 will likely struggle. While the Poco M7’s panel specifications are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology typically offers superior color accuracy and contrast. The A55’s higher brightness also suggests a more power-efficient panel at lower brightness levels, contributing to overall battery life.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Poco M7, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung typically prioritizes camera performance in its A-series devices. The Galaxy A55 is expected to feature a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. While the Poco M7 may offer a competitive main sensor, the A55’s overall camera system is likely to be more versatile and deliver consistently higher-quality images. We can assume the Poco M7 will include lower resolution auxiliary cameras, while the A55 will focus on a strong primary and ultrawide setup.
Performance
Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, but the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 features a more powerful CPU configuration: 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Poco M7’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This difference in clock speed, combined with the core count, suggests the A55 will deliver noticeably faster performance in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing and multitasking. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Poco M7, however, is a very efficient chip, and its Cortex-A78 cores will provide a solid gaming experience. The A55’s GPU is also expected to be more capable, offering higher frame rates in demanding games. The A55 also likely benefits from faster RAM (LPDDR5x is expected) compared to the Poco M7.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Poco M7’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s longer runtime suggests a combination of efficient chipset and optimized software. The A55 also supports 25W wired charging, faster than the Poco M7’s 18W charging. This means the A55 will replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. The difference in charging speed, combined with the longer battery life, makes the A55 the more convenient option for users who frequently use their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 if you need a phone primarily for gaming and everyday tasks, and prioritize maximizing performance within a tight budget. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a superior display experience, longer battery life in real-world usage, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software update commitment and established brand reliability.