Poco M7 vs Realme 12 Pro+: Which Budget Snapdragon Reigns Supreme?

The Xiaomi Poco M7 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone space. While both leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform, they target slightly different priorities – the Poco M7 focuses on affordability, while the Realme 12 Pro+ aims for a more premium experience with faster charging and a brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing all-around value, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 67W charging and brighter 802 nit display, coupled with the more powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, justify the price difference over the Poco M7.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Poco M7 Realme 12 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 661, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, March 032024, January 29
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, March 07Available. Released 2024, January 29
Body
BuildGlass front, glass back, plastic frame-
Dimensions171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in)161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight205.4 g (7.23 oz)196 g (6.91 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density)1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density)
Size6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 613Adreno 710
OSAndroid 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOSAndroid 14, Realme UI 5.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)No
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDRLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF-
Triple-50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radio, recordingNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired67W wired, 50% in 19 min
TypeLi-Po 5160 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsOcean Blue, Satin Black, Mint GreenSubmarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red
Models24108PCE2I, MZB0KE1INRMX3840, RMX3841
Price€ 135.00 / £ 118.00 / ₹ 8,999$ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400
SAR0.85 W/kg (head)     0.76 W/kg (body)-

Xiaomi Poco M7

  • Highly affordable price point
  • Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
  • Compact and lightweight design (assumed)

  • Slow 18W charging
  • Likely lower display brightness
  • Less powerful CPU for demanding tasks

Realme 12 Pro+

  • Fast 67W charging (50% in 19 min)
  • Bright 802 nit display
  • More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor

  • Higher price compared to Poco M7
  • Potentially larger and heavier design
  • May include bloatware (typical for Realme)

Display Comparison

The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a considerable advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 802 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for budget phones. While the Poco M7’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume a lower peak brightness. The Realme’s panel likely offers a more pleasant viewing experience in direct sunlight. We lack information on panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) for either device, but the brightness difference alone makes the Realme a clear winner for users who consume a lot of media outdoors.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Realme 12 Pro+’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The absence of information on sensor size for the Poco M7 implies a smaller sensor, likely resulting in poorer low-light performance. While both phones likely include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, the Realme’s higher price point suggests a greater emphasis on image processing and overall camera quality. We can assume the Realme will offer more detailed and dynamic range in most scenarios.

Performance

The Realme 12 Pro+ is equipped with the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, featuring a more potent CPU configuration – 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Poco M7’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to noticeably faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, offering good efficiency, but the 7s Gen 2’s architectural improvements provide a performance edge. The Poco M7’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is sufficient for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games compared to the Realme.

Battery Life

The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in the battery and charging department. Its 67W wired charging capability can replenish 50% of the battery in just 19 minutes, a significant advantage over the Poco M7’s slower 18W charging. While the Realme 12 Pro+'s active use score of 13:24h is provided, the Poco M7’s battery capacity and endurance are unknown. However, the faster charging speed of the Realme mitigates concerns about potentially lower battery capacity, making it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their device.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 if you need a highly affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and aren't concerned with fast charging or a top-tier display. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you prioritize faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a smoother experience with more demanding applications and games.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is a capable mid-range chipset that can run Genshin Impact at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver the same performance as flagship processors, it provides a smooth gaming experience for most popular titles.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Realme 12 Pro+ from 0% to 100%?
While 50% charge takes 19 minutes, a full 0-100% charge on the Realme 12 Pro+ with its 67W charging is estimated to take around 45-50 minutes, significantly faster than the Poco M7’s 18W charging.
❓ Does the Poco M7 support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Given its market segment, the Poco M7 likely supports VoLTE (Voice over LTE) for faster call setup and higher quality voice calls. VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) support is less certain and would depend on regional carrier compatibility.
❓ What type of storage does the Realme 12 Pro+ use – UFS 2.2 or UFS 3.1?
While not explicitly stated, the Realme 12 Pro+ likely utilizes UFS 3.1 storage, given its mid-range positioning. This offers faster read and write speeds compared to UFS 2.2, resulting in quicker app loading and file transfers.