Poco M7 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and fast charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Poco M7’s slightly newer chipset. However, the Poco M7 offers a compelling value proposition for those on a strict budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 07 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mm (6.77 x 3.06 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205.4 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.88 inches, 112.4 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.96", PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5160 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Satin Black, Mint Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 24108PCE2I, MZB0KE1IN | XT2307-1 |
| Price | € 135.00 / £ 118.00 / ₹ 8,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.76 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7
- More recent chipset (Snapdragon 4 Gen 2)
- Potentially better thermal efficiency due to 4nm process
- Aggressive price point
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely lower display brightness
- Unknown camera performance
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster charging (68W, 50% in 15 min)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Slightly older chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- 6nm process may run warmer under sustained load
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Poco M7, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower given its budget positioning. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s track record) provide a superior viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be comparable, but the Edge 40 Neo’s overall display quality is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is expected to be more versatile, though specific sensor details are missing. Motorola typically focuses on image processing and software enhancements. The Poco M7’s camera specifications are currently unknown, but given its price point, it’s likely to feature a simpler setup. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, particularly in video recording.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) and its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores offer a slight CPU performance edge over the Poco M7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7030, while not as cutting-edge as the 4nm Snapdragon, provides a good balance of performance and efficiency. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s 4nm node *should* offer better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained loads, but the Dimensity 7030’s higher clock speeds will likely translate to snappier responsiveness in everyday tasks. Both phones will likely pair with LPDDR4X RAM, limiting overall memory bandwidth.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. This is significantly better than what we’d expect from a phone in the Poco M7’s price bracket. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Poco M7’s 18W charging is comparatively slow, requiring considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. While the Poco M7’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior charging speed and endurance make it the clear winner.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 if you need a highly affordable smartphone and prioritize a recent chipset for basic tasks and light gaming. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more refined experience with significantly faster charging, a brighter display, and longer battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.