Poco M7 Pro 5G vs Realme 11 Pro+: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a brighter viewing experience, the Poco M7 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 37:46 hour endurance rating and 1179 nits peak brightness significantly outperform the Realme 11 Pro+, despite the latter's faster 100W charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G | Realme 11 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 17 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 20 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 75.7 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, HDR10+, 2100 nits (peak), Dolby Vision (India only) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 (INT) / 4 (EU) major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5110 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Lavender Frost, Lunar Dust, Olive Twilight, Classic Black | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | 2409FPCC4G, 2409FPCC4I | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | € 158.00 / $ 222.50 / £ 129.00 / ₹ 12,255 | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 37:46h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life (37:46h endurance)
- Significantly brighter display (1179 nits)
- Long-term battery health (1000 charge cycles)
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Limited camera information
Realme 11 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- Potentially stronger camera focus (inferred)
- Significantly lower battery endurance
- Dimmer display (793 nits)
Display Comparison
The Poco M7 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1179 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro+'s 793 nits. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility, giving the Poco a clear advantage in bright conditions. While both utilize LCD technology (inferred from lack of OLED specification), the higher peak brightness of the Poco translates to a more vibrant and usable experience. The Realme 11 Pro+ lacks any mention of high refresh rate or advanced panel features, suggesting a more standard display experience.
Camera Comparison
The provided data for both phones is limited regarding camera capabilities. The Realme 11 Pro+ is explicitly mentioned as having photo/video capabilities, but lacks specifics. The absence of sensor size or megapixel counts for either device makes a direct comparison impossible. We can infer that the Realme 11 Pro+ likely focuses on camera features as a key selling point, given its branding, but without concrete details, it remains speculative. The lack of information suggests neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Mediatek Dimensity 7000-series chips fabricated on a 6nm process. However, the Realme 11 Pro+ features the Dimensity 7050, with a slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz on the Poco’s 7025 Ultra). This marginal clock speed increase likely won’t translate to a noticeable difference in everyday tasks. The Poco’s CPU configuration (2x Cortex-A78, 6x Cortex-A55) is identical to the Realme, suggesting similar multi-core performance. The absence of RAM specifications necessitates caution; faster LPDDR5x RAM would benefit both devices, but without that information, it’s difficult to assess.
Battery Life
The Poco M7 Pro 5G dominates in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 37:46 hours of usage, with a tested active use score of 11:21 hours. This is a substantial improvement over the Realme 11 Pro+'s reported 112-hour endurance rating (likely a different testing methodology). While the Realme 11 Pro+ compensates with 100W wired charging, allowing for rapid top-ups, the Poco’s longevity minimizes the need for frequent charging. The Poco’s 45W charging is slower, but sufficient given its superior battery life. The Poco also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 Pro 5G if you need all-day battery life and a display that remains visible even in direct sunlight. It’s ideal for travelers, commuters, and anyone who heavily uses their phone throughout the day. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you prioritize the convenience of incredibly fast charging and are willing to trade some battery endurance for it; this phone suits users who frequently top up their devices and value speed over sustained runtime.