The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco M7 Plus aims for aggressive value with a newer Snapdragon chipset, while the Galaxy A55 leverages Samsung’s display expertise and refined software experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone delivers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and long-term software support, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the stronger choice. Its Exynos 1480 offers a performance edge and better efficiency, complemented by a significantly brighter screen. However, the Poco M7 Plus provides excellent value for those focused on raw processing power for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 13 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 19 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.5 x 80.5 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.17 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
18W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | - | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 11,371 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus
- Potentially more raw CPU power for the price.
- Faster 33W wired charging.
- 18W reverse wired charging for accessory top-ups.
- Likely inferior display quality compared to the A55.
- Less efficient chipset potentially leading to more heat.
- Uncertainty regarding long-term software support.
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Brighter and more vibrant display.
- More efficient Exynos 1480 chipset for longer battery life.
- Samsung’s commitment to software updates and security patches.
- Slower 25W wired charging.
- Potentially higher price point.
- Less raw CPU power compared to the Poco M7 Plus.
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a clear advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This significantly surpasses what we’d expect from the Poco M7 Plus, making the A55 far more usable outdoors. While the Poco M7 Plus’s panel specs are not provided, Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology typically delivers superior contrast and color accuracy. The A55’s brightness is particularly beneficial for HDR content consumption, offering a more immersive viewing experience. We can assume the Poco M7 Plus uses an LCD panel, which will struggle to match the A55’s vibrancy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Poco M7 Plus, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung typically prioritizes image processing and software optimization. The Galaxy A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced algorithms for noise reduction and dynamic range. While the Poco M7 Plus may offer competitive hardware, the A55’s image processing pipeline will likely result in more consistently pleasing photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. We can expect the A55 to have a more refined camera experience overall, even if the raw sensor specs are similar.
Performance
The Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480, fabricated on a 4nm process, holds a performance lead over the Poco M7 Plus’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm). The A55’s CPU configuration – 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – is more powerful than the Poco’s 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The 4nm node of the Exynos 1480 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. While the Poco M7 Plus offers a respectable CPU, the A55’s chipset provides a smoother experience for demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the Poco M7 Plus’s battery capacity is unknown, the A55’s efficient Exynos 1480 chipset and optimized software contribute to its impressive longevity. The A55 supports 25W wired charging, while the Poco M7 Plus offers 33W. However, the A55’s superior battery life mitigates the slower charging speed, as users will likely need to charge less frequently. The Poco M7 Plus also offers 18W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus if you need maximum CPU performance for multitasking and light gaming on a tight budget, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, longer battery life in real-world use, and Samsung’s commitment to software updates and a more polished user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480’s 4nm process and Samsung’s thermal management solutions generally prevent significant overheating. While some warmth is expected during intensive gaming, the A55 is unlikely to experience severe throttling, offering a more consistent frame rate over extended periods compared to devices with less efficient chipsets.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Poco M7 Plus significantly faster in real-world use than the 25W charging on the Galaxy A55?
While 33W is numerically faster, the Galaxy A55’s superior battery efficiency means you’ll likely charge it less often. The difference in 0-100% charge times will be noticeable, but the A55’s longer battery life may negate the need for faster charging in many cases.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Xiaomi’s MIUI on the Poco M7 Plus and Samsung’s One UI on the Galaxy A55?
Samsung’s One UI is generally considered more polished and user-friendly, with a cleaner interface and a stronger focus on stability. MIUI, while feature-rich, can sometimes feel cluttered and may include pre-installed bloatware. Samsung also provides a longer commitment to software updates and security patches.
