The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion are two contenders vying for attention. The Poco M7 Plus aims for aggressive value, while the Edge 50 Fusion (with regional chipset variations) attempts to balance performance with a more refined experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International version with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) is the stronger choice. However, the Poco M7 Plus delivers excellent value if budget is the primary concern and you can live with slower charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 13 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 19 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.5 x 80.5 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.17 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
18W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2429-1 |
| Price | ₹ 11,371 | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus
- Aggressive pricing offers excellent value.
- 18W reverse wired charging for topping up other devices.
- Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 is sufficient for basic tasks.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Likely lower display brightness.
- Less powerful processor compared to the Edge 50 Fusion (International).
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly faster 68W charging.
- Brighter 1322 nit display for outdoor visibility.
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International) for smoother performance.
- LATAM version uses a less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1.
- No reverse wireless charging.
- Potentially higher price point.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1322 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Poco M7 Plus’s display specs are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this peak brightness. The Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness advantage is crucial for users who frequently consume content outdoors. The absence of refresh rate information for the Poco M7 Plus suggests a standard 60Hz panel, while the Edge 50 Fusion is likely to offer a smoother experience with a higher refresh rate (speculation based on market segment).
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are lacking for both devices, but the focus should be on the main sensor capabilities. Without specific information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Motorola generally emphasizes image processing for natural-looking photos, while Xiaomi often leans towards more saturated colors. The absence of OIS information for either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant, as image quality is typically poor.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International) features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), a clear step up from the Poco M7 Plus’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7s Gen 2 translates to improved power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. The Edge 50 Fusion’s CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) also offers a higher peak clock speed on its prime cores compared to the Poco’s (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which would narrow the performance gap considerably. The Poco M7 Plus will be adequate for everyday tasks, but the Edge 50 Fusion (International) provides a more responsive experience for demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is substantially faster than the Poco M7 Plus’s 33W charging. While the Poco M7 Plus offers 18W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 50 Fusion, the faster charging speed of the Motorola is more impactful for most users. The Edge 50 Fusion’s active use score of 12:40h suggests good battery life, and while the Poco M7 Plus’s battery capacity is unknown, the more efficient chipset in the Motorola likely offsets any capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 Plus if you need a highly affordable smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and aren't concerned with the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prioritize a brighter display, significantly faster 68W charging, and a more powerful processor (specifically the International version with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) for smoother multitasking and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 in the Poco M7 Plus struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 can handle less graphically intensive games, Genshin Impact will likely require significant graphics settings reductions and may still experience frame drops. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion (International) with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the difference between the International and LATAM versions of the Edge 50 Fusion significant enough to avoid the LATAM model?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the LATAM version is considerably less powerful than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the International version. The performance difference is noticeable in multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness. If possible, prioritize the International version.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Edge 50 Fusion compare to typical 25W or 33W charging solutions?
68W charging is significantly faster. A full charge from 0-100% will take considerably less time than with 25W or 33W chargers. Motorola claims 50% charge in 15 minutes, which is a substantial time saving for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
