Xiaomi's 4G lineup continues to offer compelling value, but choosing between the Poco M7 4G and the Redmi Note 13 4G requires a closer look. Both devices share the same Snapdragon 685 chipset, making the differences in battery performance and display quality the key deciding factors for most users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and extended usage, the Poco M7 4G emerges as the winner. Its impressive 62-hour endurance significantly surpasses the Redmi Note 13 4G's 11.52-hour active use score. However, the Redmi Note 13 4G counters with a notably brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 13 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 171.1 x 80.5 x 8.6 mm (6.74 x 3.17 x 0.34 in) | 162.3 x 75.6 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 188.5 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired
18W reverse wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min, 100% in 70 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset |
| Models | 25062PC34E | 23129RAA4G, 23124RA7EO, 23129RA5FL |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 199.99 / £ 119.99 / € 135.52 |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
- Exceptional battery life (62:06h endurance)
- 1000 charge cycle claim suggests long-term battery health
- Reverse wired charging (18W)
- Display brightness data unavailable, likely lower than Redmi Note 13 4G
- Limited camera details
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- High peak display brightness (1313 nits)
- Faster charging to 50% (29 minutes)
- Modern design aesthetic (likely)
- Significantly shorter battery life (11:52h active use)
- May require more frequent charging
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 4G distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1313 nits, a substantial advantage over the Poco M7 4G (brightness data unavailable). This higher brightness translates to improved visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their price points, the Note 13’s brightness is a clear win for outdoor use. The Poco M7 4G’s display specifications are not provided, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles impossible, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s tuned for power efficiency rather than color fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the provided data doesn't specify sensor sizes or lens apertures. Without this information, a meaningful camera comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume both will offer acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will heavily depend on sensor size and image processing algorithms, which remain unknown. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on Xiaomi devices suggests both may include one, but these typically offer limited practical value.
Performance
Both the Poco M7 4G and Redmi Note 13 4G are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm). This chipset features an octa-core configuration with 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, meaning CPU performance will be virtually identical. The 6nm process node contributes to reasonable power efficiency. The absence of RAM specifications in the provided data prevents a comparison of memory bandwidth, but it’s likely both devices offer similar LPDDR4X configurations. Thermal performance should also be comparable, with the 685 not being a particularly power-hungry chip.
Battery Life
The Poco M7 4G boasts a remarkable 62:06h endurance, indicating exceptional battery life. This is significantly longer than the Redmi Note 13 4G’s 11:52h active use score. While the Redmi Note 13 4G offers 33W wired charging, reaching 100% in 70 minutes, the Poco M7 4G’s charging speed is not fully detailed (only 33W wired and 18W reverse wired are mentioned). The Poco M7 4G also claims 1000 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health. The Redmi Note 13 4G’s 50% charge in 29 minutes is competitive, but the overall endurance advantage clearly favors the Poco M7 4G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 4G if you need exceptional battery life and prioritize longevity between charges, making it ideal for travelers or heavy users. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display for media consumption and outdoor visibility, and are comfortable with more frequent charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 685 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 685 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but it's not designed for high-end graphics settings in demanding titles like PUBG Mobile. Expect to play at medium settings with moderate frame rates. Both phones will likely experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 13 4G compare to other phones in this price range?
33W charging is fairly standard for phones in this price bracket. While not the fastest available, it's sufficient to top up the battery reasonably quickly. The Redmi Note 13 4G's 0-50% in 29 minutes is competitive, but the Poco M7 4G’s full charge time is unknown.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Poco M7 4G useful for topping up accessories?
The 18W reverse wired charging on the Poco M7 4G can be useful for charging accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches, but it's not a fast charging solution. It's best suited for emergency top-ups or slowly charging smaller devices.
