Xiaomi Poco M7 4G vs Samsung Galaxy M34 5G: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Xiaomi Poco M7 4G emerges as the winner. Its exceptional 62-hour battery endurance and efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset provide a reliable experience. However, if 5G connectivity is a must-have, the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G is the clear choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 4G | Samsung Galaxy M34 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 13 | 2023, July 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 13 | Available. Released 2023, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 171.1 x 80.5 x 8.6 mm (6.74 x 3.17 x 0.34 in) | 161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm (6.37 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 18W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black | Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue |
| Models | 25062PC34E | SM-M346B, SM-M346B/DS, SM-M346B1, SM-M346B1/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | 0.89 W/kg (head) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
- Exceptional battery life (62h+ endurance)
- Faster 33W wired charging
- 18W reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful processor compared to the Exynos 1280
- Limited to 4G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy M34 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More powerful Exynos 1280 chipset
- Potentially superior display quality (Samsung expertise)
- Likely shorter battery life than the Poco M7
- Slower 25W wired charging
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing, the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G likely benefits from Samsung's display expertise, potentially offering superior color accuracy and brightness. However, without specific data, it's difficult to quantify. The Poco M7, given its price point, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Samsung generally excels in image processing, and the M34 likely benefits from this. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. It's reasonable to assume the M34's image processing will produce more vibrant and detailed photos, but the Poco M7 could offer a more natural look. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy M34 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset represents a significant architectural leap over the Poco M7’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The Exynos utilizes Cortex-A78 performance cores, offering a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the Poco’s Cortex-A73 cores. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. However, the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency is commendable, and for everyday tasks, the difference may be less pronounced. The M34's advantage will be most apparent in gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Poco M7 4G truly shines in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 62 hours and 6 minutes of usage. This is likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset and optimized software. While the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, its more powerful Exynos 1280 will consume more power. The Poco M7’s 33W charging is faster than the M34’s 25W, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Poco M7 also offers 18W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the M34, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 4G if you need exceptional battery life, prioritize a stable and efficient processor for everyday tasks, and don't require 5G connectivity. It's ideal for users who frequently travel to areas with limited 5G coverage or simply want a phone that lasts for days on a single charge. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G if you prefer the future-proofing of 5G, value a slightly more powerful processor for demanding applications, and are willing to trade some battery life for the added connectivity.