Poco M7 4G vs. Infinix Note 30 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and a more vibrant viewing experience, the Infinix Note 30 5G is the better choice. Its 5G connectivity, brighter 607 nit display, and faster 45W charging outweigh the Poco M7 4G’s impressive battery endurance. However, those heavily reliant on long battery life and already within 4G coverage will find the Poco M7 a compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M7 4G | Infinix Note 30 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 22, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 13 | 2023, May 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August 13 | Available. Released 2023, May 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass or leather back |
| Dimensions | 171.1 x 80.5 x 8.6 mm (6.74 x 3.17 x 0.34 in) | 168.5 x 76.5 x 8.5 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 224 g (7.90 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 6 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~374 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz, 700 nits (typ), 850 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 580 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.75, 26mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 18W reverse wired | 45W wired, bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black | Magic Black, Interstellar Blue, Sunset Gold |
| Models | 25062PC34E | X6711 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
| SAR | 0.86 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:06h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
- Exceptional battery life (62:06h endurance)
- 1000 charge cycles promise longevity
- 18W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Display brightness likely lower than the competition
Infinix Note 30 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Brighter display (607 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Faster 45W wired charging with bypass charging
- Battery endurance data unavailable, likely less than Poco M7
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Infinix Note 30 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 607 nits compared to an assumed lower brightness on the Poco M7 4G (no data provided). This makes the Infinix more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. The 1521:1 contrast ratio on the Infinix also contributes to a more visually appealing image. While the Poco M7’s display specs are unknown, the Infinix’s panel offers a clear advantage for multimedia consumption and general usability. The absence of refresh rate data for both phones suggests they likely utilize standard 60Hz panels, which is typical for this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, it’s safe to assume both phones feature primary sensors around the 50MP mark. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. The Poco M7 4G likely focuses on Qualcomm’s image processing algorithms, while the Infinix Note 30 5G leverages MediaTek’s. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on both phones is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical benefit. Image quality will likely be comparable in good lighting conditions, with the Infinix potentially having an edge in low-light scenarios due to its more modern chipset’s image signal processor.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm process nodes, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the chipsets differ significantly. The Infinix Note 30 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 6080 features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offering a performance edge over the Poco M7 4G’s Snapdragon 685, which uses four Cortex-A73 cores at 2.8 GHz. While the Poco’s cores have a higher clock speed, the A76 architecture in the Dimensity 6080 is more efficient and delivers better single-core performance, crucial for everyday tasks. The Dimensity 6080 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a key differentiator. The Poco M7 4G is limited to 4G LTE.
Battery Life
The Poco M7 4G shines in battery endurance, achieving an impressive 62:06 hours of usage. This is likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset and optimized software. The Infinix Note 30 5G, while not providing endurance data, compensates with significantly faster charging – 45W wired versus the Poco’s 33W. The Infinix also supports bypass charging, allowing the phone to be used while charging, minimizing heat buildup. The Poco M7 4G also offers 18W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, but the Infinix doesn’t specify reverse charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M7 4G if you need exceptional battery life – its 62:06h endurance is a standout feature – and operate primarily within 4G network areas. You’ll benefit from a phone that lasts significantly longer between charges. Buy the Infinix Note 30 5G if you prioritize 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, a brighter and more engaging display for media consumption, and quicker charging times, even if it means slightly less overall battery endurance.