The Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco M6 Pro focuses on delivering strong processing power at an aggressive price point, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo aims for a more balanced experience with a focus on display quality and fast charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the superior choice. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use battery score outweigh the Poco M6 Pro’s lower price. However, the Poco M6 Pro offers a compelling value proposition for those prioritizing raw processing power on a tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, August 05 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, August 05 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.2 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, PD | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Forest Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 23076PC4BI | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 9,990 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better thermal management due to 4nm process
- Strong processing power for the price
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely lower display brightness and quality
- Unknown camera capabilities
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display (1073 nits)
- Higher price tag
- 6nm process may run slightly warmer under sustained load
- Dimensity 7030 may not be as efficient as Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Poco M6 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to fall short of this brightness level. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its higher price point, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of refresh rate information for the Poco M6 Pro suggests it may be limited to a standard 60Hz panel, while the Edge 40 Neo is expected to have a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is expected to have a more sophisticated camera system, likely featuring a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Poco M6 Pro’s camera specifications are unknown, but its lower price point suggests a simpler setup. The Edge 40 Neo’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on the Poco M6 Pro’s camera makes it difficult to assess its capabilities beyond basic photography.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) and its CPU configuration of 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores offer a performance advantage over the Poco M6 Pro’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) and its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7030, while slightly less efficient than the 4nm Snapdragon, allows for higher clock speeds. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s strength lies in its efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load, but the Edge 40 Neo will likely excel in burst performance and graphics-intensive tasks. The Poco M6 Pro’s 4nm node *should* translate to better thermal management, but the Dimensity 7030’s core configuration suggests a performance lead.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in the battery and charging department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate excellent battery life. Crucially, the 68W wired charging capability allows for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the Poco M6 Pro’s slower 18W charging. While the Poco M6 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, the slower charging speed suggests it may be smaller. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery capacity, ensuring minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro if you need a phone primarily for demanding tasks like gaming or running multiple apps simultaneously and are willing to compromise on charging speed and battery endurance. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more refined experience with a vibrant display, significantly faster charging, and all-day battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chip, its 6nm process isn't as thermally efficient as the 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. However, Motorola's thermal management solutions are generally well-regarded. Expect some warming during extended gaming, but significant throttling is unlikely. The Edge 40 Neo's larger chassis also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Motorola Edge 40 Neo from 0% with the 68W charger?
Motorola claims a 50% charge in 15 minutes. Based on this, a full 0-100% charge is estimated to take around 35-40 minutes, making it one of the fastest charging phones in this price range. The Poco M6 Pro's 18W charging will take considerably longer, likely exceeding 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Poco M6 Pro powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 can run these games, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo will provide a noticeably better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
