Poco M6 Pro vs. Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G emerges as the winner. Its Helio G99 Ultra chipset and 67W charging offer a noticeable edge, despite the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s slightly brighter display and more efficient processor.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 11 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 75 x 8 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14, planned upgrade to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 100% in 44 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Purple | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | 2312FPCA6G | XT2307-1 |
| Price | $ 170.00 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
- Faster charging (67W, full charge in 44 min)
- Longer battery life (11:46h active use)
- Potentially higher peak performance due to clock speed
- Older chipset architecture (Helio G99 Ultra)
- Less efficient processor potentially leading to throttling
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- More modern chipset (Dimensity 7030, 6nm)
- Slightly brighter display (1073 nits)
- Potentially better sustained performance due to efficiency
- Shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Slower full charge time (44 min)
Display Comparison
Both the Poco M6 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo feature displays capable of reaching over 1000 nits of peak brightness, with the Edge 40 Neo marginally leading at 1073 nits versus the Poco’s 1053 nits. While the difference is minimal, it could be noticeable in direct sunlight. Neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (OLED/LCD) or refresh rate, which is a significant omission. The lack of high refresh rate panels on both devices suggests a focus on cost savings. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and without color accuracy data, it’s difficult to assess which display offers more vibrant or accurate colors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without knowing megapixel counts or sensor sizes, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a concern. Lens apertures are also unknown, impacting low-light performance. It’s likely both phones rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential; these sensors typically produce low-quality images. Focusing on the main sensor’s capabilities is key, but without further data, it’s impossible to declare a clear winner.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) offers a more modern architecture than the Poco M6 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra. The Dimensity 7030 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the G99 Ultra’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This architectural advantage, coupled with the 6nm process node, should result in better power efficiency and sustained performance. However, the G99 Ultra’s raw clock speed and potentially more aggressive boosting could provide a slight edge in short bursts. Both phones share 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. RAM speed is not specified, but the chipset capabilities suggest both could support LPDDR4X or LPDDR5. Thermal management will be crucial; the Dimensity 7030’s efficiency may prevent throttling better than the G99 Ultra under prolonged load.
Battery Life
The Poco M6 Pro boasts an active use battery score of 11:46h, exceeding the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo’s older endurance rating of 80h suggests good overall efficiency, the Poco’s real-world test result is more compelling. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging is slightly faster on paper, reaching 50% charge in 15 minutes, while the Poco M6 Pro takes 44 minutes for a full charge. However, the Poco’s faster overall charging speed and larger battery capacity provide a more practical benefit for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G if you need a phone primarily for gaming, demanding apps, or simply want the fastest possible charging speeds within a budget. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more polished software experience, a slightly brighter display, and a more power-efficient chipset that may translate to longer sustained performance under load, even if peak performance is lower.