The Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Poco focuses on delivering a solid core experience at an aggressive price point, while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo aims for a more balanced package with a focus on display quality and faster charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and real-world implications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use battery score outweigh the Poco M6 Plus’s lower price. However, the Poco M6 Plus offers a respectable performance for basic tasks and is a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 01 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 05 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 28mm (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5030 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Purple, Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 10,299 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus
- More affordable price point
- Efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slower 33W charging
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera system
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Higher price tag
- 6nm process node less efficient than Poco's 4nm
- Battery capacity not specified
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Poco M6 Plus (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower given its price point). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s track record) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting power consumption during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera is listed as 'Photo / Video', suggesting a more versatile setup. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, Motorola typically focuses on image processing algorithms to enhance photo quality. The Poco M6 Plus likely features a more basic camera system geared towards casual photography. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on budget phones is a concern; their limited utility rarely justifies their inclusion. Without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but Motorola’s brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a slight CPU clock speed advantage over the Poco M6 Plus’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78). Both chips utilize a 6nm and 4nm process node respectively, with the Snapdragon benefiting from the more efficient 4nm process. However, the Dimensity 7030’s more powerful GPU likely translates to better gaming performance. The Poco M6 Plus will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Edge 40 Neo provides a smoother experience for demanding applications and games. RAM configurations are not specified, but faster LPDDR5x RAM on the Edge 40 Neo would further enhance its performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h demonstrate excellent battery life. Crucially, the 68W wired charging capability allows for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant time saver. The Poco M6 Plus’s 33W charging is considerably slower. While the Poco M6 Plus’s battery capacity is not specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s superior charging speed and endurance rating make it the clear winner for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 Plus if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light communication, and your budget is extremely limited. You’ll be sacrificing some performance and features, but getting a working device at the lowest possible cost. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a vibrant display, significantly faster charging, and a more refined user experience, even if it means spending a bit more. This phone is ideal for users who consume a lot of media and need a phone that can keep up with their active lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030 is generally well-regarded for its thermal efficiency. While it can get warm under sustained load, Motorola’s thermal management system should prevent significant throttling. The 6nm process node is less efficient than the Poco's 4nm, but the Edge 40 Neo's larger chassis may provide better heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Poco M6 Plus slow enough to be a major inconvenience for daily use?
Yes, 33W charging is noticeably slower than the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Expect a significantly longer time to fully charge the Poco M6 Plus, potentially requiring overnight charging for a full top-up. This is a key area where the Edge 40 Neo excels.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 will provide a more consistent and visually appealing gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ Are there any significant software differences between Xiaomi's MIUI and Motorola's My UX?
MIUI is known for its extensive customization options but can also include pre-installed bloatware. Motorola’s My UX offers a cleaner, near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware and a focus on simplicity. This difference in software approach is a matter of personal preference.
