Xiaomi's budget 4G lineup presents a compelling choice for value-conscious consumers. The Poco M6 4G, leveraging the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, aims for raw performance, while the Redmi Note 13 4G prioritizes efficiency with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G emerges as the better choice. Its significantly longer battery life (11:52h active use) and more efficient 6nm Snapdragon 685 chipset outweigh the Poco M6 4G’s slightly more powerful, but less efficient, CPU.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 10 | 2024, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 13 | Available. Released 2024, January 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.3 x 75.6 x 8 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 188.5 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.79 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 960Hz PWM, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G91 Ultra (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 29 min, 100% in 70 min |
| Type | 5030 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Purple | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset |
| Models | 2404APC5FG | 23129RAA4G, 23124RA7EO, 23129RA5FL |
| Price | € 116.05 / $ 137.64 | $ 199.99 / £ 119.99 / € 135.52 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | 0.77 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco M6 4G
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance for short bursts.
- May be more affordable (depending on market).
- 33W fast charging.
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G91 Ultra).
- Likely shorter battery life.
- Display brightness is unknown and potentially lower.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
- Superior battery life (11:52h active use).
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 685).
- Brighter display (1313 nits).
- CPU may be slightly slower in peak benchmarks.
- Potentially higher price point.
- 33W charging, while fast, isn't groundbreaking.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 4G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1313 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Poco M6 4G. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price point), the Redmi Note 13’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The Poco M6 4G’s display specifications are currently unknown, making a detailed comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles difficult, but the Redmi Note 13’s brightness alone is a substantial win.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given Xiaomi’s typical strategy, the Redmi Note 13 4G likely features a more refined camera system. The Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the Helio G91 Ultra’s, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and apertures prevents a definitive judgment, but the Redmi Note 13’s chipset suggests a slight edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 13 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, built on a 6nm process, offers improved power efficiency compared to the Poco M6 4G’s 12nm MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra. While the Poco M6 4G’s CPU features faster Cortex-A75 cores (2.0 GHz vs 2.8 GHz on the Redmi Note 13), the Snapdragon 685’s architecture and process node provide a more balanced experience. The Redmi Note 13’s CPU, with its Cortex-A73 cores, is designed for sustained performance, while the G91 Ultra may exhibit more throttling under prolonged load. This impacts gaming and multitasking, favoring the Redmi Note 13 for longer sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 4G demonstrably excels in battery life, achieving 11 hours and 52 minutes of active use. Both devices support 33W wired charging, with the Redmi Note 13 4G reaching 50% charge in 29 minutes and 100% in 70 minutes. While the charging speeds are identical, the Redmi Note 13’s larger battery capacity and the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency combine to deliver significantly longer runtimes. The Poco M6 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, but its less efficient chipset will likely result in shorter usage times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M6 4G if you prioritize occasional gaming and responsiveness in apps, and are willing to compromise on battery life. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G if you value all-day battery life, consistent performance for everyday tasks, and a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Redmi Note 13 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a gaming powerhouse, the Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process and improved thermal management prevent significant throttling, offering a more consistent gaming experience than the Poco M6 4G’s Helio G91 Ultra under sustained load.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on both phones in real-world use?
Both phones offer 33W charging, but the Redmi Note 13 4G takes 29 minutes to reach 50% and 70 minutes for a full charge. This indicates a well-optimized charging curve. The Poco M6 4G’s charging times are unknown, but the less efficient chipset may impact charging efficiency.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A75 vs A73) noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical tasks like browsing, social media, and video playback, the difference between the Cortex-A75 and A73 cores is minimal. The Snapdragon 685’s overall efficiency and optimized software integration provide a smoother, more responsive experience in daily use.
