Xiaomi consistently delivers excellent value smartphones, and the Poco M5s and Redmi Note 11 are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the Poco M5s thanks to its more efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset and faster charging. While the Poco M5s boasts a slightly brighter display, the Redmi Note 11's overall performance and charging speed make it the more well-rounded choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 05 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 06 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 64% in 30 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | 2207117BPG | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 120 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 132h
|
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 360681 (v9)
GeekBench: 1831 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Slightly brighter display
- Potentially better gaming performance (Helio G95)
- Good value for money
- Less efficient chipset
- Slower charging
- Can get warm during intensive tasks
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 680)
- Faster charging (60 min to 100%)
- Excellent battery life
- Smoother everyday performance
- Slightly dimmer display
- Gaming performance not as strong as Poco M5s
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with excellent contrast. The Poco M5s has a slightly higher peak brightness of 756 nits compared to the Redmi Note 11's 736 nits, making it marginally better in direct sunlight. However, the difference is subtle and unlikely to be a deciding factor for most users. Both offer a smooth 90Hz refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two. Both feature versatile camera setups, typically including a main sensor, ultrawide, macro, and depth sensor. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance can be inconsistent. The Poco M5s might have a slight edge in video recording due to the Helio G95's capabilities, but both offer 1080p video recording.
Performance
The Redmi Note 11's Snapdragon 680 (6nm) offers better efficiency and performance than the Poco M5s's Helio G95 (12nm). While the Helio G95 is a capable gaming chipset, the Snapdragon 680 provides smoother everyday performance and better battery life. The Redmi Note 11's CPU architecture also contributes to its overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 has a slight advantage in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 126h compared to the Poco M5s's 132h. However, the Redmi Note 11's faster 33W charging (100% in 60 minutes) significantly reduces charging time, making it a more convenient option.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco M5s is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly brighter display and a powerful gaming chipset (Helio G95). The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a better fit for those seeking all-day battery life, faster charging, and a more efficient processor for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco M5s generally offers slightly better gaming performance due to its Helio G95 chipset, although the Redmi Note 11 is still capable of handling most games.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Redmi Note 11 charges to 100% in approximately 60 minutes with its 33W charger, while the Poco M5s takes longer, though specific charging times vary.
