The Xiaomi Poco series consistently delivers impressive value for money. The Poco M5s and Poco X5 are two strong contenders in the budget smartphone arena, each boasting unique strengths. But which one deserves your hard-earned cash? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 edges out the M5s thanks to its more modern Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, faster charging, and slightly better overall performance. While the M5s offers a slightly longer endurance rating, the X5's improvements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 05 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 06 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 64% in 30 min | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, White | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | 2207117BPG | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 132h
|
Endurance rating 106h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
-27.3 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 360681 (v9)
GeekBench: 1831 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 400895 (v9)
GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Poco M5s
- Slightly higher peak brightness
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Longer endurance rating (theoretical)
- Older chipset
- Slower charging
- Less efficient processor
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Modern Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Faster charging
- 5G connectivity
- More efficient processor
- Slightly lower peak brightness
- Shorter endurance rating (theoretical)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Poco M5s boasts a slightly higher peak brightness of 756 nits compared to the X5's 728 nits. Both have excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal). While the difference is subtle, the M5s might offer marginally better visibility in direct sunlight. Both use AMOLED panels, providing excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable between the two. Both offer versatile camera setups, but detailed image quality comparisons would require more extensive testing. Both phones likely offer good value for their price range in terms of camera capabilities, with decent image processing and features.
Performance
The Poco X5 holds a significant advantage here. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G chipset (6nm) is considerably more modern and efficient than the Poco M5s's Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance. The X5's CPU architecture also contributes to its superior speed.
Battery Life
The Poco M5s initially appears to win with an endurance rating of 132h, compared to the X5's 106h. However, the X5's faster charging (100% in 60 minutes vs 64% in 30 minutes for the M5s) significantly reduces downtime. While the M5s has a theoretical advantage in longevity, the X5's charging speed is a practical benefit.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco M5s? Users prioritizing maximum battery life and a slightly more vibrant display might lean towards the M5s. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X5? Those seeking a smoother experience, faster charging, and 5G connectivity will find the X5 a better fit.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X5 support 5G?
Yes, the Poco X5 features 5G connectivity thanks to its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco X5 is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.