Xiaomi consistently delivers excellent value smartphones, and the Poco M5 and Redmi Note 11 are prime examples. Both offer compelling features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11 edges out the Poco M5 thanks to its significantly brighter display, faster charging, and overall more refined experience. While the Poco M5 offers a powerful chipset for gaming, the Redmi Note 11 provides a more well-rounded package for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 05 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 13 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Yellow | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | 22071219CG | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | About 100 EUR | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1363:1 |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 386311 (v9)
GeekBench: 1896 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco M5
- Powerful Helio G99 chipset for gaming
- Excellent battery life
- Good value for money
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less refined camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Brighter display
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- More polished user experience
- Slightly less powerful chipset than Poco M5
- May not be ideal for hardcore gamers
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 boasts a substantial advantage in display brightness, measuring 736 nits compared to the Poco M5's 448 nits. This makes the Redmi Note 11 significantly easier to view outdoors. While both offer excellent contrast ratios (1363:1 for the Poco M5 and 'Infinite' nominal for the Redmi Note 11), the Redmi Note 11's brightness is a key differentiator. The Redmi Note 11 also often features an AMOLED panel, offering richer colors and deeper blacks, a common feature for the Redmi Note series.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 11 often has a slightly more versatile setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. While specific camera specs are not provided, Redmi Note series generally prioritize image quality and features. Both offer decent video recording capabilities.
Performance
The Poco M5's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset provides a slight edge in raw processing power, particularly beneficial for gaming. The Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi Note 11 is still capable, but the G99 generally handles more demanding games with better frame rates. However, day-to-day performance is smooth on both devices.
Battery Life
Both devices offer impressive battery life, with endurance ratings of 121h and 126h respectively. The Redmi Note 11's 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a full charge in approximately 60 minutes, compared to the Poco M5's 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco M5 is ideal for budget-conscious gamers and users prioritizing raw processing power. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a better choice for those who value a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more polished user experience, especially if media consumption is a priority.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco M5 generally offers better gaming performance due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 have a better display?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11's significantly brighter display makes it easier to view in various lighting conditions.
❓ Which phone charges faster?
The Redmi Note 11 charges much faster with its 33W charging support.
