Xiaomi consistently delivers excellent value in the budget smartphone market. The Poco M4 Pro and Redmi Note 11 are two popular contenders, offering compelling features at attractive price points. But which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco M4 Pro edges out the Redmi Note 11 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and faster charging. However, the Redmi Note 11 boasts a more efficient 6nm process, potentially leading to slightly better real-world battery performance despite similar endurance ratings. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 28 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179.5 g (6.31 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 58 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | MZB0B5VIN, 2201117PI, 2201117PG | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | € 100.18 | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 126h
|
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 318444 (v9)
GeekBench: 1836 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro
- Slightly faster charging
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Bright display
- Less efficient chipset (12nm)
- Potentially more thermal throttling
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- More efficient chipset (6nm)
- Smooth user experience
- Good value
- Slightly slower charging
- Potentially slightly lower gaming performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a vibrant 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth and immersive viewing experience. The Poco M4 Pro measures a peak brightness of 737 nits, while the Redmi Note 11 hits 736 nits – a negligible difference. Both have excellent contrast ratios. The displays are virtually identical in quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature versatile camera setups, typically including a 50MP main sensor, ultrawide lens, and macro lens. Image quality is generally good in well-lit conditions, but low-light performance can be inconsistent. The Poco M4 Pro might offer slightly more detail in certain scenarios due to its processor, but the Redmi Note 11's image processing could produce more pleasing results for some users. Video recording capabilities are comparable.
Performance
The Poco M4 Pro utilizes a Mediatek Helio G96 chipset built on a 12nm process, while the Redmi Note 11 features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G on a more efficient 6nm process. While the Helio G96 generally offers slightly better raw performance for gaming, the Snapdragon 680's efficiency can translate to better sustained performance and potentially less thermal throttling. Day-to-day tasks are handled smoothly on both devices.
Battery Life
Both devices boast a large 5000mAh battery and an endurance rating of 126h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Redmi Note 11's 6nm Snapdragon 680 offers a slight advantage in power efficiency, potentially leading to marginally better real-world battery life despite the identical endurance rating. Both support 33W fast charging, with the Poco M4 Pro charging slightly faster (58 min vs 60 min).
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance and fast charging for gaming or demanding apps. The Redmi Note 11 is a great pick for those seeking a well-rounded device with a focus on efficiency and a smooth user experience for everyday tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Poco M4 Pro generally offers slightly better gaming performance due to its chipset, but both phones can handle most games smoothly.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 11 more power efficient?
Yes, the Redmi Note 11's 6nm Snapdragon 680 is more power-efficient than the Poco M4 Pro's 12nm Helio G96, potentially leading to slightly better battery life.
