Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs Poco X5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 emerges as the winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and slightly more powerful chipset. While the M4 5G boasts exceptional battery life, the X5's overall improvements make it the more compelling option for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M4 5G | Xiaomi Poco X5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 15 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow | Jaguar Black, Wildcat Blue, Supernova Green |
| Models | 22041219PG | 22111317PG, 22111317PI |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.84 W/kg (head) 0.68 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 121h | Endurance rating 106h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1630:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | -27.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 336380 (v9) GeekBench: 1730 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 400895 (v9) GeekBench: 2088 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Poco M4 5G
- Exceptional battery life (121h endurance)
- Affordable price
- Decent display contrast
- Slower charging (18W)
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Poco X5
- Faster charging (33W)
- Brighter display (728 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- Sleeker design (likely)
- Slightly shorter battery life (106h endurance)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 728 nits, making it much easier to see in direct sunlight. While the M4 5G has a respectable 1630:1 contrast ratio, the X5's 'infinite' contrast (likely marketing) combined with the higher brightness provides a superior viewing experience. Both phones likely use similar LCD panels, but the X5's brightness is a significant advantage.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' camera setups, suggesting similar capabilities. However, the Snapdragon 695 in the X5 often benefits from better image processing algorithms. While detailed camera comparisons would require testing, the X5 is likely to produce slightly better images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Both likely offer decent image quality for the price range.
Performance
The Poco X5's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the M4 5G's Dimensity 700. The Snapdragon 695 is built on a more efficient 6nm process, contributing to better power efficiency despite the slightly higher performance. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times on the X5. Both phones handle everyday tasks well, but the X5 is the better choice for gaming or demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Poco M4 5G shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 121 hours. The Poco X5, with a rating of 106 hours, still offers excellent battery performance, but falls short of the M4 5G's longevity. If you prioritize all-day (and potentially multi-day) battery life above all else, the M4 5G is a strong contender.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco M4 5G? Users prioritizing maximum battery life and a more affordable price point. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco X5? Those seeking faster charging, a brighter display for outdoor use, and a slightly more responsive performance.