Xiaomi Poco M4 5G vs Poco M4 Pro 5G: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco M4 Pro 5G edges out the M4 5G thanks to its faster Dimensity 810 chipset, brighter display, and significantly quicker 33W charging. While both offer excellent battery life, the Pro model's overall performance and charging speed make it the slightly better pick for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco M4 5G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 15 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Power Black, Cool Blue, Poco Yellow | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | 22041219PG | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 121h | Endurance rating 123h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1630:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.8 LUFS (Average) | -24.9 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 336380 (v9) GeekBench: 1730 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco M4 5G
- Excellent battery life
- Affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Decent display
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Faster performance (Dimensity 810)
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (33W)
- Improved image processing
- Slightly higher price
- Battery life marginally less than M4 5G
Display Comparison
The Poco M4 Pro 5G boasts a noticeable advantage in display quality. While both offer a respectable 1553:1 contrast ratio, the Pro model's measured 510 nits peak brightness significantly improves visibility in sunlight. The M4 5G's display is adequate, but the Pro's is simply better.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature similar camera setups, likely including a 50MP main sensor and ultrawide lens. However, the Dimensity 810's improved image signal processor (ISP) in the Pro model likely results in slightly better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. Video recording capabilities are comparable.
Performance
The Dimensity 810 in the Poco M4 Pro 5G provides a tangible performance boost over the Dimensity 700 in the M4 5G. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and improved gaming performance on the Pro model. Both handle everyday tasks well, but the Pro shines under heavier loads.
Battery Life
Battery life is a strong point for both devices, with endurance ratings of 121h and 123h respectively. In practical use, you can expect all-day battery life from either phone. The Poco M4 Pro 5G's 33W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a full charge in approximately 59 minutes, compared to the M4 5G's slower 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The Poco M4 5G is ideal for budget-conscious users prioritizing long battery life and a decent 5G experience. The Poco M4 Pro 5G is a better choice for those who value faster performance, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and quicker charging capabilities.