The Xiaomi Poco M3 and Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC represent compelling options in the sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver value, they take different approaches: the Poco M3 prioritizes endurance and a surprisingly robust build, while the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC focuses on faster charging and a more modern chipset. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a reliable experience, the Poco M3 emerges as the winner. Its 154-hour endurance rating and solid build quality outweigh the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s faster charging, especially considering the Snapdragon 662’s efficient power consumption.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 24 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, November 27 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.3 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm (6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 - 64GB
UFS 2.2 - 128GB | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
2.5W reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cool Blue, Poco Yellow, Power Black | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | M2010J19CG, M2010J19CI | X695C |
| Price | $ 130.00 / ₹ 11,590 | - |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 154h | - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1567:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.5 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 177904 (v8)
GeekBench: 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Poco M3
- Exceptional battery life (154h endurance)
- Efficient Snapdragon 662 processor
- Durable build quality
- Slower 18W charging
- Display lacks vibrancy compared to AMOLED
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster 33W charging
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G95 processor
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Less efficient processor (12nm)
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Poco M3
Display Comparison
The Poco M3 features a display with a measured peak brightness of 439 nits and a 1567:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, this is a fairly standard LCD panel. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it likely offers similar brightness levels. The Poco M3’s contrast ratio suggests decent black levels for an LCD, but users seeking vibrant colors and deep blacks may find both displays lacking compared to AMOLED alternatives. Neither manufacturer specifies refresh rates, suggesting both operate at the standard 60Hz.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, it’s safe to assume both rely on budget-friendly sensors. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s brand positioning suggests a slightly greater emphasis on camera features, but without concrete specs, this remains speculative. Users should temper expectations regarding low-light performance and image detail on both devices.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco M3 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm), an efficient processor built on an 11nm process. This translates to good power efficiency, contributing to its excellent battery life. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC, however, boasts the MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). While the G95 is built on a slightly less efficient 12nm process, its CPU configuration – 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – offers a performance edge over the Poco M3’s Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver), particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. This makes the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC the better choice for mobile gamers, though thermal throttling could become a factor during extended gaming sessions due to the less efficient node.
Battery Life
The Poco M3 shines with an impressive 154-hour endurance rating. This is a testament to the Snapdragon 662’s efficiency and likely a larger battery capacity (though not specified). The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC compensates with 33W wired charging, significantly faster than the Poco M3’s 18W charging. This means the Infinix can replenish its battery much quicker, but the Poco M3’s longer endurance means you’ll likely need to charge it less frequently. The Poco M3 also offers 2.5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 if you need exceptional battery life, a durable device, and prioritize a stable, well-optimized software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently travel or rely heavily on their phone throughout the day. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you prefer faster 33W charging, a slightly more powerful processor for gaming, and are comfortable with potentially more software customization and updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is a capable gaming chip, but its 12nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process. While it offers higher peak performance, it's more prone to thermal throttling during extended gaming. Expect some performance dips after 30-45 minutes of demanding gameplay.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Poco M3 with the 18W charger?
While the Poco M3 supports 18W charging, the included charger may be lower wattage. Expect a full charge to take approximately 2.5 to 3 hours. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W charging will significantly reduce this time, potentially to around 1 hour.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specs on both phones a cause for concern?
Yes, it indicates that neither phone is a standout performer in the camera department. Both likely utilize budget sensors and image processing. Don't expect flagship-level image quality, especially in low-light conditions.
