The Motorola Moto G100S and Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences and helps you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Motorola Moto G100S emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, built on a more efficient 4nm process, offers a noticeable advantage in CPU performance and thermal management, complemented by 30W charging. However, the Poco M3 Pro remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 19 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue | Black, Blue |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Likely larger community support due to Xiaomi's popularity
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset compared to the G100S
- Potentially more thermal throttling under heavy load
Motorola Moto G100S
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Significantly faster 30W charging
- Improved thermal management for sustained performance
- Higher price tag
- Motorola's software update track record is less consistent than Xiaomi's
- May not offer the same level of customization options as Xiaomi's MIUI
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. However, the Moto G100S, being a slightly more premium offering, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration. The Poco M3 Pro, focusing on cost-effectiveness, may prioritize size over quality. Bezels are likely comparable, reflecting the mid-range segment. Without specific data, a definitive winner is impossible to declare, but the G100S has a slight edge based on brand positioning.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct comparison is limited. However, Motorola generally emphasizes image processing for natural colors, while Xiaomi often leans towards more saturated, vibrant images. The G100S, potentially having a slightly higher budget, might incorporate a larger main sensor, improving low-light performance. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is likely on both devices at this price point. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro cameras on either phone is questionable, serving primarily as marketing features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G100S’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm) boasts a more modern architecture and fabrication process than the Poco M3 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The G100S’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a significant performance uplift over the Poco’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged use. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications. While the Dimensity 700 is capable, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 offers a more future-proof and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Poco M3 Pro features 18W wired charging, while the Moto G100S steps up to 30W. This difference is substantial. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the G100S significantly reduces downtime. A full charge on the G100S will likely take under an hour, while the M3 Pro could require over two hours. This is a key advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal charging interruptions. The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s improved efficiency may also contribute to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M3 Pro if you need a highly affordable device for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and aren't concerned with demanding applications or extended gaming sessions. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you prioritize smoother multitasking, better performance in graphically intensive games, and quicker charging times, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco M3 Pro struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The MediaTek Dimensity 700 can run Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a playable frame rate. Expect some frame drops during intense scenes. The Motorola Moto G100S, with its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, will provide a smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 30W charging on the Moto G100S compared to the Poco M3 Pro's 18W charging?
The 30W charging on the Moto G100S can realistically shave off 30-60 minutes of charging time compared to the Poco M3 Pro. A full 0-100% charge on the G100S is likely to take around 50-60 minutes, while the M3 Pro could take over 2 hours.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G100S get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4's 4nm process is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, it's less likely to experience significant throttling compared to the 7nm Dimensity 700 in the Poco M3 Pro, resulting in more consistent performance.
