The Xiaomi Poco M2 and Oppo F17 Pro represent distinct approaches to the sub-₹20,000 smartphone market. The Poco M2 prioritizes gaming performance with its Helio G80 chipset, while the F17 Pro focuses on a sleek design and faster charging with the Helio P95. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and value, the Poco M2 offers a compelling package. While the Oppo F17 Pro boasts faster charging and more RAM, the Poco M2’s lower price point and capable processor make it the more sensible choice for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, September 08 | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2020, September 15 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.36 in) | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 100.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10, MIUI 12 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Wireless FM radio (no wired headphones required) | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4015 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Brick Red, Pitch Black, Slate Blue | Magic Blue, Matte Black, Metallic White |
| Models | MZB9919IN, M2004J19PI | CPH2119 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.85 W/kg (head) 0.42 W/kg (body) | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | ₹ 10,499 | - |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | ₹ 17,990 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | ₹ 10,799 | - |
Xiaomi Poco M2
- Significantly lower price
- Helio G80 optimized for gaming
- Good value for money
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less RAM (6GB vs 8GB)
Oppo F17 Pro
- Faster 30W charging
- More RAM (8GB) for multitasking
- Potentially more refined camera system
- Higher price point
- Helio P95 less focused on gaming
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize 12nm chipsets, suggesting similar power draw and therefore likely similar display panel quality within their respective price brackets. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the F17 Pro’s higher price suggests a potentially slightly better panel, but this is speculative. Bezels are likely comparable, given the market segment. Color accuracy is also unknown, but both brands typically tune displays for vibrant, rather than color-accurate, visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond the presence of cameras are sparse. The F17 Pro’s higher price point suggests a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and better image processing. However, without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Poco M2 likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience for social media sharing, while the F17 Pro aims for a more refined photographic output. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; focusing on the primary sensor’s quality is more important.
Performance
The Oppo F17 Pro’s Mediatek Helio P95 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a slight CPU clock speed advantage over the Poco M2’s Helio G80 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to marginally faster app loading and smoother multitasking. However, the G80 is specifically tuned for gaming, potentially offering better sustained performance in graphically demanding titles. The F17 Pro’s 8GB of RAM, compared to the Poco M2’s 6GB, further enhances multitasking capabilities, reducing app reloading. The 12nm process node is shared, meaning thermal management will likely be similar, though the F17 Pro’s larger chassis might offer slightly better heat dissipation.
Battery Life
The Poco M2’s 18W charging is significantly slower than the F17 Pro’s 30W charging, which Oppo claims reaches 50% in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. This is a major advantage for the F17 Pro, catering to users who prioritize quick top-ups. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the F17 Pro’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Poco M2 will require longer charging times, making it more suitable for overnight charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco M2 if you need a reliable device for gaming on a budget, prioritize long-term value, and don't mind a more utilitarian design. Buy the Oppo F17 Pro if you prefer a more stylish aesthetic, value faster charging speeds, and require the extra RAM for heavier multitasking, even at a higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco M2’s Helio G80 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Helio G80 is specifically designed for gaming and should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling, so expect some frame drops during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the Oppo F17 Pro’s 30W charging compared to the Poco M2’s 18W charging in real-world use?
The F17 Pro’s 30W charging can top up the battery from 0% to 50% in approximately 30 minutes, and fully charge in 53 minutes. The Poco M2’s 18W charging will take considerably longer – likely over 2 hours for a full charge – making the F17 Pro ideal for users who need quick power boosts.
❓ Is the extra RAM in the Oppo F17 Pro (8GB vs 6GB) noticeable for everyday tasks?
Yes, the extra 2GB of RAM in the F17 Pro will improve multitasking performance. You’ll be able to keep more apps open in the background without experiencing slowdowns or app reloading, which is beneficial for users who frequently switch between applications.
