Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs. ZTE RedMagic 8 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Gaming and Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset and impressive 18:52 active use battery score provide a compelling advantage. However, gamers who absolutely demand the fastest possible charging speeds will find the RedMagic 8 Pro+’s 165W charging a significant draw.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | ZTE nubia RedMagic 8 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2022, December 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2022, December 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Poco Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.8 x 7.9 mm or 8.3 mm | 164 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g or 220 g (7.69 oz) | 230 g (8.11 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass | Unspecified |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, Redmagic OS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.12µm, under display |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, accessory connector, DisplayPort |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 38 mins 50W wireless, 50% in 31 mins 22.5W reverse wireless | 165W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 14 min |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Denim Blue | Black, Transparent |
| Models | 25102PCBEG | - |
| Price | £ 549.00 / € 659.46 | About 700 EUR |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- Exceptional battery life (18:52h active use)
- Brighter display (1077 nits)
- Slower wired charging than RedMagic 8 Pro+
- Wireless charging is slower than wired
ZTE nubia RedMagic 8 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 165W wired charging (14 minutes to 100%)
- Gaming-focused design and features
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is still a very capable chipset
- Likely shorter battery life compared to Poco F8 Ultra
- Potentially less refined camera system
Display Comparison
The Poco F8 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1077 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display even in bright sunlight. While the RedMagic 8 Pro+’s display specifications are not provided, nubia typically prioritizes high refresh rates for gaming. The Poco F8 Ultra’s brightness advantage is significant, and the absence of LTPO information for the RedMagic suggests it may not be as power-efficient in dynamic refresh rate scenarios. The Poco F8 Ultra’s brightness will be more beneficial for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the gaming focus of the RedMagic 8 Pro+, it’s likely the Poco F8 Ultra will offer a more refined and versatile camera system. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures on the RedMagic 8 Pro+ suggests a less emphasized camera experience. The Poco F8 Ultra, positioned as a more all-around flagship, likely prioritizes image quality and features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Poco F8 Ultra features the Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm), utilizing a unique Oryon V3 Phoenix CPU architecture with a 2x4.6 GHz prime core cluster and a 6x3.62 GHz efficiency cluster. This contrasts with the RedMagic 8 Pro+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), employing a more traditional ARM Cortex CPU configuration. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 should offer superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The higher clock speeds of the Oryon cores in the Poco F8 Ultra suggest a performance edge in CPU-bound tasks.
Battery Life
The Poco F8 Ultra delivers an impressive 18:52 hours of active use, showcasing excellent battery life. While the RedMagic 8 Pro+ lacks active use data, its 165W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 14 minutes. The Poco F8 Ultra’s 100W wired charging (38 minutes to 100%) and 50W wireless charging provide flexibility, but cannot match the RedMagic’s speed. The Poco F8 Ultra’s longer battery life offsets the RedMagic’s faster charging for many users, but those prioritizing minimal downtime will favor the RedMagic.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks, offers exceptional battery endurance for all-day use, and provides a balanced experience across gaming, productivity, and multimedia. Buy the ZTE nubia RedMagic 8 Pro+ if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds available, are a dedicated mobile gamer who values minimal downtime, and appreciate a more aggressive, gaming-focused aesthetic.