Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs Motorola Edge 30 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the power user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra takes the lead. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers a demonstrable performance advantage, coupled with incredibly fast charging. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra remains a compelling option, offering a polished experience and competitive features at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | Motorola Edge 30 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2022, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Poco Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.8 x 7.9 mm or 8.3 mm | 161.8 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g or 220 g (7.69 oz) | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1250 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/320/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - PRC |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 38 mins 50W wireless, 50% in 31 mins 22.5W reverse wireless | 125W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Po 4610 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Denim Blue | Interstellar Black, Starlight White |
| Models | 25102PCBEG | XT-2201 |
| Price | £ 549.00 / € 659.46 | € 238.91 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -23.4 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1074722 (v9) GeekBench: 4265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 73fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- Extremely fast 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Impressive real-world battery life (18:52h active use)
- Limited information on display technology and camera specs
- Potential for higher price due to new chipset
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Fast 125W wired charging
- Well-established brand reputation and software experience
- Older chipset architecture (4nm vs 3nm)
- Slower reverse wireless charging (10W)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, with the Poco F8 Ultra achieving a measured peak brightness of 1077 nits and the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra reaching 1047 nits. The difference is minimal and unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. Both displays boast an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting excellent black levels. However, the Poco F8 Ultra’s display technology isn’t specified, while the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra’s panel is likely OLED, given its contrast ratio. The lack of refresh rate information for the Poco F8 Ultra is a notable omission, while the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is expected to have a 144Hz panel, offering smoother scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited for the Poco F8 Ultra. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is known for its strong photo and video capabilities, though specific sensor details are missing from the provided data. Without knowing the Poco F8 Ultra’s sensor sizes, apertures, and image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is difficult. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra’s reputation suggests a well-tuned camera experience, but the Poco F8 Ultra could potentially offer a competitive package depending on its hardware and software implementation. The absence of any camera details for the Poco F8 Ultra is a significant gap in the information.
Performance
The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Poco F8 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) utilizes a unique octa-core configuration with 2x 4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L cores and 6x 3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M cores. This contrasts with the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a more traditional 1x 3.19 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x 2.75 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x 1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 setup. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 should deliver superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 4nm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, translating to sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Oryon cores are custom designs, potentially offering architectural advantages over the standard ARM cores found in the Motorola device. While the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is no slouch, the Poco F8 Ultra is expected to deliver a significant performance uplift, particularly in CPU-intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Poco F8 Ultra boasts impressive charging speeds: 100W wired (38 mins to 100%), 50W wireless (50% in 31 mins), and 22.5W reverse wireless. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counters with 125W wired charging and 50W wireless, but only 10W reverse wireless. While the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra’s wired charging is faster on paper, the Poco F8 Ultra’s overall charging ecosystem is more versatile. The Poco F8 Ultra’s active use battery score of 18:52h is a concrete metric, while the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra only has an 'Endurance rating' of 92h, which is less informative. The Poco F8 Ultra’s real-world battery performance suggests it can comfortably last a full day of heavy use, despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity than the Motorola device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra if you demand the absolute latest in mobile processing power, need the fastest charging available (100W wired and 50W wireless), and prioritize benchmark scores. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra if you value a refined software experience, a potentially more competitive price, and a well-rounded flagship package without necessarily needing the bleeding edge of performance.