Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and charging speed, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and 100W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 and 23W charging. However, the Pixel 7 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in Google’s ecosystem and camera capabilities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Poco Shield Glass), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.8 x 7.9 mm or 8.3 mm | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 218 g or 220 g (7.69 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 38 mins 50W wireless, 50% in 31 mins 22.5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 6500 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Denim Blue | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | 25102PCBEG | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | £ 549.00 / € 659.46 | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
- 50W wireless and 22.5W reverse wireless charging
- Camera specs currently unknown
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera system with AI enhancements
- Seamless Google software experience
- Excellent display with high contrast ratio
- Slow 23W charging
- Less powerful Tensor G2 chip compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display Comparison
Both devices feature excellent displays, with the Pixel 7 Pro reaching 1090 nits and the Poco F8 Ultra hitting 1077 nits. The difference in peak brightness is negligible in real-world use. While both offer vibrant colors, the Pixel 7 Pro’s ‘infinite’ contrast ratio suggests a superior OLED panel, likely contributing to deeper blacks. However, without refresh rate data for the Poco F8 Ultra, it’s difficult to assess motion clarity. The Pixel 7 Pro’s display benefits from Google’s color calibration, ensuring accuracy for content consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms to produce stunning images. While the Poco F8 Ultra’s camera specs are currently unknown, the Pixel 7 Pro’s established track record in image processing and detail capture gives it a significant advantage. The Pixel 7 Pro excels in low-light conditions and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. Without detailed camera specifications for the Poco F8 Ultra, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s software optimization is a major differentiator.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Poco F8 Ultra’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s octa-core configuration (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) promises significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. The 3nm process node translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Tensor G2, while capable, is optimized for AI tasks rather than raw horsepower. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding games and resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Poco F8 Ultra’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. This is dramatically faster than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W charging, which takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Poco F8 Ultra also offers 50W wireless charging and 22.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent or less powerful on the Pixel 7 Pro. While the Pixel 7 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 83 hours, the Poco F8 Ultra’s active use score of 18:52h suggests comparable, if not superior, real-world battery life, especially considering its faster charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra if you need uncompromising processing power for gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. It’s ideal for users who value speed and convenience, particularly with its rapid charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prioritize a seamless software experience, exceptional computational photography, and tight integration with Google services. It’s the better choice for users who value AI-powered features and a refined user interface.