Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Comparison of Power and Photography
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 100W charging offer a compelling package. However, if photography is paramount, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra’s advanced camera system justifies its higher price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2023, April 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, April 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 74.6 x 9.1 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 227 g (8.01 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1300 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lenses, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 67mm filter ring holder (optional) |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 or f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.8, 75mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.0, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.8, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/480/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, Dolby Vision HDR 10-bit rec. (4K@60fps, 1080p) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, Auracast | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 37 min, 22.5W reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 100% in 49 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6210 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Olive Green, White, Orange, Yellow, Blue |
| Models | 2510DPC44G | 2304FPN6DC, 2304FPN6DG |
| Price | € 503.60 / £ 399.00 | € 797.98 / $ 389.69 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- Superior battery life (17:35h active use)
- Faster charging (100W, 37 min)
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8 Elite)
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Potentially less premium build quality
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- Exceptional camera system
- Higher peak display brightness
- Wireless charging support
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:09h active use)
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both devices feature high-quality displays, but differ in peak brightness and likely panel technology. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1207 nits, exceeding the Poco F8 Pro’s 1094 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight for the 13 Ultra. While neither spec sheet explicitly mentions LTPO, the 13 Ultra, as a flagship, is highly likely to incorporate it for adaptive refresh rates and improved power efficiency. The F8 Pro, targeting a more price-sensitive market, may utilize a standard OLED panel. Both will likely offer excellent color accuracy, but the 13 Ultra’s higher brightness provides a visual advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is unequivocally the camera champion. While the Poco F8 Pro’s camera specs are not provided, the 13 Ultra’s system is renowned for its versatility and image quality. It features a multi-camera array with a large main sensor (likely 1-inch), advanced OIS, and a suite of computational photography features. The 13 Ultra excels in both photo and video capture, offering professional-level control and exceptional low-light performance. The F8 Pro will likely offer a competent camera experience, but it won’t match the 13 Ultra’s capabilities in terms of detail, dynamic range, and overall image quality. Ignoring the likely presence of low-resolution auxiliary sensors on both devices, the 13 Ultra’s focus on sensor size and image processing is a clear differentiator.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F8 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring an octa-core configuration with a unique split: 2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M cores. This architecture is designed for sustained peak performance. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra, however, employs the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) with a more traditional octa-core setup: 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. While the Gen 2 is a proven performer, the 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer superior thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained clock speeds, translating to a noticeable advantage in demanding gaming scenarios. The F8 Pro is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its performance edge.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The Poco F8 Pro achieves an impressive 17:35h of active use, while the Xiaomi 13 Ultra manages only 10:09h. This is despite the 13 Ultra’s older endurance rating of 108h, which is a different metric. The F8 Pro’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software contribute to its superior battery performance. Charging speeds are also competitive: 100W wired for the F8 Pro (37 minutes to 100%) versus 90W wired for the 13 Ultra (35 minutes to 100%). The 13 Ultra adds 50W wireless charging (49 minutes to 100%) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the F8 Pro, which offers 22.5W reverse wired charging. The F8 Pro’s faster overall battery life and charging speed make it the more convenient option for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro if you need a powerhouse for gaming, demanding applications, and fast charging, and are willing to compromise slightly on camera versatility. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Ultra if you are a photography enthusiast, value a premium build quality, and require the most advanced mobile camera features available, even if it means sacrificing some battery endurance and peak processing speed.