Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs. vivo X100 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and efficient 3nm process deliver superior CPU and GPU power. However, the vivo X100 Pro offers a brighter display and a potentially more refined camera experience, making it a strong contender for multimedia enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, Auracast | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 37 min, 22.5W reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | 6210 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Blue, Black | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | 2510DPC44G | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | € 503.60 / £ 399.00 | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Longer battery life in active use
- Faster wired charging with broader protocol support
- Less bright display compared to the vivo X100 Pro
- Camera details are lacking, suggesting it's not a primary focus
vivo X100 Pro
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially superior camera system with advanced image processing
- 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Dimensity 9300 may throttle more under sustained load
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1472 nits compared to the Poco F8 Pro’s 1094 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology (implied by the high contrast ratios typical of flagships), the X100 Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor use. We lack PWM frequency data, but the X100 Pro’s display is likely tuned for color accuracy, appealing to content creators. The Poco F8 Pro, while still bright, will be more suitable for indoor viewing.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights the vivo X100 Pro’s focus on camera capabilities, though specifics are limited. The presence of 'Photo / Video' suggests a comprehensive camera system. While sensor sizes and lens apertures are unknown, vivo’s history indicates a strong emphasis on image processing and computational photography. The Poco F8 Pro’s camera specs are absent, implying it may not be a primary selling point. The X100 Pro is likely to excel in low-light photography and video stabilization, leveraging its advanced image processing pipeline. The absence of details on the Poco F8 Pro’s camera suggests it may rely more on software enhancements than cutting-edge hardware.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB, 3nm) features a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz), designed for peak performance. The vivo X100 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 9300 (4nm) with a Cortex-X4 based core arrangement (1x3.25 GHz + 3x2.85 GHz + 4x2.0 GHz). The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process gives it a theoretical edge in power efficiency and thermal management, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the Dimensity 9300 is a powerful chip, the Snapdragon 8 Elite is positioned as Qualcomm’s top-tier offering, suggesting a performance advantage, especially in GPU-intensive tasks. Both phones likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the Snapdragon’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Poco F8 Pro delivers a longer active use battery score of 17:35h compared to the vivo X100 Pro’s 13:53h. This suggests better overall battery efficiency, despite the X100 Pro’s larger battery capacity (implied). The Poco F8 Pro’s 100W wired charging (with PD3.0, QC3+, and PPS support) is incredibly fast, achieving a full charge in just 37 minutes. The X100 Pro also offers 100W wired charging, reaching 50% in 14 minutes, but lacks the same breadth of charging protocol support. The X100 Pro adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features absent on the Poco F8 Pro. The Poco F8 Pro’s 22.5W reverse wired charging is slower, but still useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. Its faster charging and longer active use battery life are ideal for power users. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, a potentially superior camera system, and a more balanced overall experience, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.