Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs. Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and impressive 17:35h active use score provide a significant advantage. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s faster charging and slightly brighter display appeal to those valuing convenience and visual pop.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Oppo Find X7 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 221 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, Auracast | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 37 min, 22.5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 6210 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown |
| Models | 2510DPC44G | PHY110, PHY120 |
| Price | € 503.60 / £ 399.00 | $ 546.64 |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (17:35h active use)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Competitive pricing expected for the performance offered
- Slower charging speed (37 minutes to 100%)
- No wireless charging support
Oppo Find X7 Ultra
- Faster charging (100% in 26 minutes)
- 50W wireless charging support
- Slightly brighter display (1165 nits)
- Significantly shorter battery life (12:47h active use)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may be outperformed by 8 Elite in CPU tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices feature high-quality displays, but differ in key metrics. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a slightly brighter panel at 1165 nits compared to the Poco F8 Pro’s 1094 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both are excellent, the difference is noticeable. Neither specification details panel technology (LTPO or not), but given the flagship status, LTPO is highly probable on both. Bezels are assumed to be minimal on both devices, aligning with current design trends. Color accuracy is not specified, but both brands typically deliver well-calibrated displays.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. However, the focus should be on the main sensors and image processing. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra, given its 'Ultra' branding, likely prioritizes camera capabilities, potentially featuring a larger sensor and more advanced image stabilization. The absence of details on lens apertures further complicates the comparison. We can assume both phones will offer a range of shooting modes, but image processing style – leaning towards natural or more saturated colors – will be a key differentiator.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F8 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix L and M cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance. The Oppo Find X7 Ultra employs the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a more conventional core arrangement (1x Cortex-X4, 3x Cortex-A720, 2x Cortex-A720, 2x Cortex-A520). While the Gen 3 is powerful, the 3nm process and Oryon cores of the 8 Elite suggest a potential edge in raw CPU power for the Poco. Both likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed isn't specified. Thermal management will be crucial; the 3nm node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer better efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Battery life is a significant differentiator. The Poco F8 Pro achieves an impressive 17:35h of active use, significantly outperforming the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s 12:47h. This suggests superior power efficiency, likely stemming from the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process. While both support 100W wired charging, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra is faster, reaching 100% in 26 minutes compared to the Poco’s 37 minutes. The Oppo also offers 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Poco, which only provides 22.5W reverse wired charging. The faster charging of the Oppo partially offsets its smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro if you need maximum CPU performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and prioritize all-day battery life. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon cores and the phone’s efficient power management. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prefer a faster charging experience, a marginally brighter display, and are willing to trade some battery life for those features. It’s geared towards users who frequently top up their phones and appreciate a premium feel.