Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sheer processing power and gaming performance, the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite. However, the Honor Magic6 Pro counters with a significantly brighter display and faster wireless charging, making it a better choice for multimedia consumption and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 26 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 26 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 2000 nits (HBM), 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, Auracast | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS, 100% in 37 min, 22.5W reverse wired | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 6210 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | 2510DPC44G | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | € 503.60 / £ 399.00 | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
- Superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Longer battery life in active use
- Faster wired charging (100W)
- Lower peak display brightness
- No wireless charging
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- Fast 66W wireless charging
- Potentially superior camera image processing
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slower wired charging (80W)
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro immediately distinguishes itself with a measured peak brightness of 1578 nits, substantially exceeding the Poco F8 Pro’s 1094 nits. This difference translates to significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ high refresh rate panels (data not provided, assumed based on flagship status), the Magic6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator. The Poco F8 Pro’s display, while still excellent, will struggle to match the Magic6 Pro’s outdoor performance. We expect the Magic6 Pro to also have better color accuracy and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rate, though this is unconfirmed.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the flagship positioning of both devices suggests high-quality camera systems. The Honor Magic6 Pro, given Honor’s recent focus on camera innovation, likely prioritizes computational photography and image processing. The Poco F8 Pro, while capable, may lean towards a more straightforward image capture approach. Sensor size and lens apertures would be crucial details to determine the low-light performance and overall image quality of each device. We can assume both will offer capable main sensors and ultrawide lenses, but details on telephoto capabilities are missing.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F8 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) features a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz), designed for peak performance. The Honor Magic6 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) with a more conventional CPU layout (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 + 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520). The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should offer better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance under load, minimizing thermal throttling. While the Gen 3 is a powerful chip, the Elite’s architecture and node size give the Poco F8 Pro an edge in raw processing power. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the Poco F8 Pro’s chipset is the defining factor.
Battery Life
The Poco F8 Pro delivers a solid 17:35h of active use, while the Honor Magic6 Pro manages 14:06h. This suggests the Poco F8 Pro’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software contribute to longer battery life. However, the Magic6 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging options: 80W wired, 66W wireless, and reverse wireless. The Poco F8 Pro offers 100W wired charging, reaching 100% in 37 minutes, but lacks wireless charging capabilities beyond 22.5W reverse wired. The Magic6 Pro’s wireless charging is a major convenience factor, and its faster overall charging speed (despite lower wattage) could offset the smaller battery capacity for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro if you need uncompromising CPU and GPU performance for demanding games and applications, and value the fastest possible wired charging. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you prioritize a stunning, incredibly bright display for outdoor visibility, prefer the convenience of 66W wireless charging, and appreciate a more refined, all-around flagship experience.