Poco F7 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Poco F7 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset delivers significantly higher performance. However, the Samsung Galaxy A54 remains a strong contender for those valuing a polished software experience, reliable camera, and longer-term software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 24 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 24 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 215.7 g (7.62 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~447 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 114.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1700 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4" | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 80% in 30 min 22.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 6500 mAh - International model· Si/C Li-Ion 7550 mAh - India model | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Cyber Silver | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | 25053PC47G, 25053PC47I | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | € 329.90 / $ 376.57 / £ 289.00 | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:03h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7
- Significantly faster processor for gaming and demanding tasks
- Much faster 90W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Software experience may not be as polished as Samsung's One UI
- Camera performance is currently unknown and may not match Samsung
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Refined One UI software experience
- Reliable camera performance (based on Samsung's reputation)
- Good battery endurance
- Slower processor compared to the Poco F7
- Significantly slower 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Poco F7 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1525 nits, compared to the Galaxy A54’s 980 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays feature an 'Infinite' (Samsung) or unspecified (Poco) contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the Poco F7 provides a more vibrant and punchy image. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve battery, but the Poco F7’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer photo and video capabilities, the context data lacks specifics to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing is generally known for its vibrant colors and pleasing aesthetics, while Xiaomi often leans towards a more natural look. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance. The Galaxy A54 likely benefits from Samsung’s established camera algorithms and software features. The Poco F7’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and image processing pipeline, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) is a significant leap ahead of the Galaxy A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm). The Snapdragon’s octa-core configuration, featuring a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.21 GHz, promises substantially faster CPU and GPU performance. The 4nm process node also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Exynos 1380, while capable, is geared towards efficient everyday tasks rather than sustained high performance. The Poco F7 will excel in graphically intensive games and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 delivers a compelling battery and charging package. Its 64:03h endurance rating and 90W wired charging (with 80% charge in 30 minutes) are significant advantages. The Galaxy A54, with an endurance rating of 119h, demonstrates good longevity, but its 25W charging is considerably slower. The Poco F7’s active use score of 14:45h also surpasses the A54’s 11:15h, indicating better real-world performance under load. The 22.5W reverse wired charging on the Poco F7 is also a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding apps, and future-proofing. Its 90W charging and active use battery score of 14:45h cater to power users. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a balanced experience with a focus on camera quality, a refined One UI software experience, and a more established brand reputation. Its endurance rating of 119h suggests good overall battery longevity, even if active use is lower.