Poco F7 vs. Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Poco F7 emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, coupled with 90W charging, offers a compelling package. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro remains a strong contender for those valuing wireless charging and potentially better camera image processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 24 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 215.7 g (7.62 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~447 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.83 inches, 114.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1700 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4" | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 80% in 30 min 22.5W reverse wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 6500 mAh - International model· Si/C Li-Ion 7550 mAh - India model | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Cyber Silver | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | 25053PC47G, 25053PC47I | - |
| Price | € 329.90 / $ 376.57 / £ 289.00 | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 64:03h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Faster wired charging (90W vs 125W, quicker to 80%)
- Potentially better sustained performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
- Lower battery endurance rating
- Lacks wireless charging
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Wireless charging support
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Lower peak display brightness
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 may throttle more under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco F7 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1525 nits compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Pro’s 1050 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher peak brightness of the Poco F7 provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on the Poco F7 means it won't dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving like some higher-end panels, but the brightness advantage is a significant win.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Given Motorola’s history with image processing, the Edge 40 Pro likely offers a more refined and consistent camera experience, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Poco F7 may rely more on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less advanced hardware. The lack of detail makes a direct comparison impossible, but Motorola generally prioritizes camera quality in this price bracket.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) features a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – designed for sustained performance. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) with a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. While the Gen 2 historically held the performance crown, the 8s Gen 4 is closing the gap, and in some tests, surpasses it. The 8s Gen 4’s architecture focuses on efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but specific speeds weren't provided.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 117 hours, while the Poco F7 achieves 64:03 hours. However, this is a complex metric. The Poco F7 compensates with significantly faster charging – 90W wired, achieving 80% charge in 30 minutes, compared to the Edge 40 Pro’s 125W, which reaches 50% in 6 minutes and 100% in 23 minutes. The Poco F7 also offers 22.5W reverse wired charging, while the Edge 40 Pro provides 15W wired and 5W wireless reverse charging. The Edge 40 Pro’s wireless charging is a key advantage, but the Poco F7’s faster wired charging and reverse wired capabilities offer greater flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 if you need a phone optimized for gaming and fast charging, and are comfortable with a slightly less refined software experience. It’s ideal for users who prioritize raw performance and value. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro if you prefer a more polished software experience, value wireless charging convenience, and anticipate needing reverse wireless charging capabilities. It’s a better fit for users who prioritize a complete feature set and a premium feel.