Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, built on a 3nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge and potentially better efficiency, while the slightly brighter display and comparable battery endurance seal the deal. The 14T Pro's faster charging is a benefit, but doesn't outweigh the overall performance advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, (wide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 34 min 50W wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | 24122RKC7G | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | $ 725.00 / £ 534.12 / € 495.90 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:53h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Superior chipset performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially better thermal management due to 3nm process
- Slower wired charging compared to the 14T Pro
- Wireless charging time not specified
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- Significantly faster 120W wired charging
- Strong multi-core performance from Dimensity 9300+
- Potentially more refined software experience (Xiaomi UI)
- Lower peak display brightness
- 4nm process may lead to more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both the Poco F7 Ultra and Xiaomi 14T Pro feature excellent displays, but the F7 Ultra edges ahead with a measured peak brightness of 1506 nits compared to the 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the specifics regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are not provided; however, the higher peak brightness of the F7 Ultra suggests a more advanced panel capable of delivering a more vibrant and readable experience. The absence of LTPO information means we can't assess adaptive refresh rate efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Unfortunately, the provided data lacks camera specifications. However, given the positioning of these devices, we can infer that both will feature capable camera systems. The Xiaomi 14T Pro, being positioned slightly higher, might incorporate a larger main sensor or more advanced image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also a significant omission. We can assume both will have a standard suite of lenses, but the image quality will depend heavily on software optimization and sensor capabilities.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Poco F7 Ultra boasts the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture, designed in-house by Qualcomm, prioritizes single-core performance and efficiency. Conversely, the Xiaomi 14T Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4nm) with a more traditional core arrangement – one Cortex-X4, three Cortex-X4, and four Cortex-A720 cores. The 3nm fabrication of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should provide a significant advantage in thermal management and power efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 9300+ excels in multi-core tasks, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s Oryon cores are optimized for responsiveness and gaming.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Ultra offers a 62:53h endurance score, with an active use score of 13:32h, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro achieves 12:32h of active use. Despite not knowing the exact battery capacity, the F7 Ultra demonstrates slightly better overall endurance. However, the 14T Pro shines in charging speed, reaching 100% in just 19 minutes with its 120W wired charging, compared to the F7 Ultra’s 34 minutes. Both support 50W wireless charging, taking 45 minutes (14T Pro) versus an unspecified time (F7 Ultra). The faster wired charging of the 14T Pro is a clear advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you prioritize raw performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value a potentially cooler running device. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and prefer Mediatek's processing philosophy, potentially benefiting from its multi-core performance in specific workloads.