Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and blazing-fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the S24 FE. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE offers superior battery endurance and a more refined software experience, making it a better choice for those valuing longevity and ecosystem integration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S24 FE |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.3 x 8 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Exynos 2400e (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Xclipse 940 |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 75mm (telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, (wide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 10 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 34 min 50W wireless | 25W wired, PD, QC2, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5300 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Blue, Graphite, Gray, Mint, Yellow |
| Models | 24122RKC7G | SM-S721B, SM-S721B/DS, SM-S721U1, SM-S721U, SM-S721W, SM-S7210, SM-S721N |
| Price | $ 725.00 / £ 534.12 / € 495.90 | $ 249.74 / C$ 498.99 / £ 335.00 / € 387.00 / ₹ 34,180 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 0.71 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.86 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:53h endurance, 1000 cycles | 42:00h endurance, 2000 cycles |
| Energy | Class A | Class B |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class C | Class C |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Significantly faster charging (120W)
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
- Brighter display (1506 nits)
- Shorter battery endurance (62:53h)
- MIUI software may not appeal to all users
Samsung Galaxy S24 FE
- Longer battery life (42:00h endurance)
- More refined Samsung software experience
- Reverse wireless charging
- Slower charging (25W wired)
- Less powerful Exynos 2400e chipset
Display Comparison
The Poco F7 Ultra boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1506 nits compared to the S24 FE’s 1372 nits, providing better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays are excellent, the higher peak brightness of the Poco gives it a slight edge. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel type, but given the price point, both are likely to be high refresh rate AMOLED panels. The S24 FE benefits from Samsung’s established display calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate colors out of the box, though this requires further testing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco F7 Ultra will likely prioritize computational photography and aggressive image processing, while the S24 FE will lean towards a more natural look. The absence of sensor size information is a key omission. The S24 FE benefits from Samsung’s established camera software and image processing pipeline, which generally delivers consistent results. The Poco F7 Ultra will need to demonstrate compelling image quality to compete. We can assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality of the supporting lenses (ultrawide, telephoto) remains unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) is architecturally superior to the S24 FE’s Exynos 2400e (4nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, offering a distinct performance advantage, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks. The 10-core configuration of the Exynos 2400e attempts to compensate, but the larger core count doesn’t translate to equivalent single-core performance. The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The S24 FE's Exynos chip has been known to exhibit thermal throttling under heavy load, a concern the Poco F7 Ultra aims to mitigate.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE takes a clear lead in battery endurance, offering 42 hours of measured endurance versus the Poco F7 Ultra’s 62:53h. However, this is somewhat misleading. The Poco F7 Ultra compensates with significantly faster charging – 120W wired, achieving 100% in just 34 minutes, compared to the S24 FE’s 25W charging taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Poco also adds 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the S24 FE. The S24 FE’s 2000 battery cycles suggest a longer lifespan, but the Poco’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a smaller battery capacity for daily use. The active use score of 13:32h for the Poco vs 11:48h for the S24 FE shows the Poco's efficiency in active use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you need uncompromising gaming performance, incredibly fast charging, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software. This phone is ideal for power users and mobile gamers. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE if you prefer a more polished software experience, longer battery life, and the convenience of Samsung’s ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some peak performance.