Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra vs. Oppo Find X7: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and 120W charging significantly outperform the Oppo Find X7. However, the Find X7 offers a more refined experience and potentially better thermal management, making it a strong contender for those valuing efficiency.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra | Oppo Find X7 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5 , 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 27 | 2024, January 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, March 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Shield Glass), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 162.7 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm or 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 212 g (7.48 oz) | 202 g or 206 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Poco Shield Glass, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2300 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, upgradable to Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 24mm, (wide), 1/3.42", 0.64µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 34 min 50W wireless | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 5300 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Yellow | Black, Dark Blue, Light Brown, Purple |
| Models | 24122RKC7G | PHZ110 |
| Price | $ 725.00 / £ 534.12 / € 495.90 | About 520 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 62:53h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class D (45 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Elite performance
- Industry-leading 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Excellent battery endurance (62:53h)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Limited camera details available
Oppo Find X7
- Efficient Dimensity 9300 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Reputable brand with a focus on user experience
- Slower charging speeds (100W wired)
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display Comparison
The Poco F7 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1506 nits, suggesting excellent outdoor visibility. While the Oppo Find X7’s display specifications are absent, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The lack of LTPO information for either device means we can’t assess adaptive refresh rate efficiency. However, the Poco’s measured brightness gives it an immediate advantage for users frequently exposed to direct sunlight. Color accuracy and delta-E values are unknown for both, requiring further testing.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, we can infer that both will feature multi-camera systems. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS is critical. The Poco F7 Ultra, being a performance-focused device, might prioritize computational photography, while the Oppo Find X7 could lean towards more natural image processing. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device would be largely inconsequential, offering minimal benefit over the main sensors.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) utilizes Oryon V2 Phoenix cores – a custom design promising significant performance gains. Its octa-core configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz) is geared towards sustained high performance. The Oppo Find X7’s Dimensity 9300 (4nm) employs a different architecture (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720). While the Dimensity 9300 is a powerful chip, the 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite should translate to better thermal efficiency and potentially higher sustained clock speeds, benefiting demanding tasks like gaming. The Poco’s LPDDR5x RAM speed is also a key factor in its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Poco F7 Ultra’s battery endurance is rated at 62:53 hours, with an active use score of 13:32 hours, demonstrating excellent longevity. Its 120W wired charging is a standout feature, achieving a full charge in just 34 minutes, complemented by 50W wireless charging. The Oppo Find X7’s 100W wired charging (50% in 10 minutes, 100% in 26 minutes) is still fast, but noticeably slower than the Poco. While the Oppo’s battery capacity is unknown, the Poco’s superior charging speed and endurance give it a clear advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra if you need uncompromising gaming performance, the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to potentially manage slightly higher temperatures. Buy the Oppo Find X7 if you prefer a more balanced smartphone experience, prioritizing efficient power usage and a potentially smoother long-term performance profile, even if it means sacrificing some peak speed.